Is Moderating effect of Uncertain Economic Policies helpful for a Sustainable Environment in Emerging Economies?

被引:1
作者
Hussain, Muzzammil [1 ,2 ]
Hanif, Nadia [3 ]
Wang, Yiwen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gujrat, Fac Management & Adm Sci, Gujrat, Pakistan
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Psychol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Educ, UE Business Sch, Div Management & Adm Sci, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
Economic policies; Environment-related Innovation in Technologies; Carbon emissions; Emerging Seven Economies; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; CO2; EMISSIONS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; DYNAMIC RELATIONSHIP; KUZNETS CURVE; STIRPAT MODEL; NATURAL-GAS; INNOVATION; IMPACT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-24269-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The basic priority to neutralize carbon emissions (CE) is to achieve the sustainable development goal of climate action. In this regard, the role of renewable energy (RE) is widely debated. Transition to RE and environment-related innovation in technologies (ERIT) is a need of the hour. However, the challenge of uncertain economic policies in the transition process is interesting to study. Therefore, the present study intends to add a value to the literature by re-examining the interactive effect of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) in RE and ERIT and the transition process towards carbon neutrality. The second-generation econometric methodology is applied to empirically test the proposed interactive linkage of EPU, RE, ERIT, and CE. Findings reported the negative role of EPU in adopting RE and ERIT in seven emerging economies: Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, and Turkey. However, the ERIT and RE are found to be supportive of neutralizing the CE. Emerging seven (E7) countries are suggested to be consistent in their economic policies to nurture the transition process toward a sustainable environment.
引用
收藏
页码:31370 / 31382
页数:13
相关论文
共 93 条
[11]  
Baker SR, 2013, UNCERTAINTY REDUCE G, DOI [DOI 10.3386/W19475, 10.3386/W19475]
[12]   Innovation across Europe: How important are institutional differences? [J].
Barbosa, Natalia ;
Faria, Ana Paula .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (09) :1157-1169
[13]   THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT [J].
BEDER, S .
IEEE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY MAGAZINE, 1994, 13 (04) :14-19
[14]  
Bello U, 2021, Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, V09, P151, DOI [10.4236/gep.2021.912010, 10.4236/gep.2021.912010, DOI 10.4236/GEP.2021.912010, 10.4236/GEP.2021.912010]
[15]   The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions [J].
Bhattacharya, Mita ;
Churchill, Sefa Awaworyi ;
Paramati, Sudharshan Reddy .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 111 :157-167
[16]   What Affects Innovation More: Policy or Policy Uncertainty? [J].
Bhattacharya, Utpal ;
Hsu, Po-Hsuan ;
Tian, Xuan ;
Xu, Yan .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2017, 52 (05) :1869-1901
[17]   An analysis of energy justice programs across the United States [J].
Carley, Sanya ;
Engle, Caroline ;
Konisky, David M. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 152
[18]  
Chertow M.R., 2001, J IND ECOL, V4, P13, DOI [DOI 10.1162/10881980052541927, 10.1162/10881980052541927]
[19]   Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization [J].
Danis ;
Ulucak, Recep ;
Khan, Salah Ud-Din .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 54
[20]   The pathway toward pollution mitigation: Does institutional quality make a difference? [J].
Danish ;
Ulucak, Recep .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (08) :3571-3583