Fished or farmed: Life cycle impacts of salmon consumer decisions and opportunities for reducing impacts

被引:15
|
作者
Ziegler, Friederike [1 ]
Hilborn, Ray [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] RISE Res Inst Sweden, Agr & Food, POB 5401, S-40229 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Ctr Sustaining Seafood, Seattle, WA USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Aquaculture; Fisheries; Greenhouse gas emissions; Life Cycle Assessment; LCA; Wild; Globalsalmonidproduction; PINK SALMON; PERFORMANCE; HATCHERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158591
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Salmon is a nutritious and popular food among consumers predominantly in wealthy countries around the world. Since the mid-1990s farmed salmon production has exceeded wild salmon harvest, and is now 80 % of total global salmon supply. The environmental impacts of farmed salmon are frequently discussed and consumers are faced with a multitude of choices even after deciding to have salmon for dinner: species, production method, origin, product form. We present life cycle impacts of fresh and frozen salmon products, originating in purse seine fisheries for pink salmon and gill net fisheries for sockeye salmon in Alaska, when sold on markets in Europe and the United States. Norwegian salmon products are then modelled to the same markets in fresh and frozen form, based on literature data. Impact categories included were greenhouse gas emissions, marine eutrophication, marine ecotoxicity and land use. A fish in, fish out ratio is also calculated and differences in content of nutrients and contaminants described. Frozen products from wild sockeye and pink salmon had the lowest emissions in both markets. For consumers in the U.S. and Europe, wild salmon products have 46-86 % and 12-71 % lower greenhouse gas emissions than farmed Norwegian salmon, respectively, depending on species and product form. Farmed salmon also had higher land use, marine ecotoxic and eutrophying emissions and fish in, fish out ratio. Important differences exist in nutritional and contaminant content between the three types of salmon production. Improvement options as well as an optimized supply chain are modelled showing greenhouse gas reduction opportunities of 40-50 % also for the best performing chains. Results can be used as a baseline for improved data collection and emission reductions. Recommendations for consumers, industry and policymakers who can facilitate and even drive development towards more sustainable salmon products are provided.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Implications of high animal by-product feed inputs in life cycle assessments of farmed Atlantic salmon
    Robert Parker
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 982 - 994
  • [32] Implications of high animal by-product feed inputs in life cycle assessments of farmed Atlantic salmon
    Parker, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (05): : 982 - 994
  • [33] Life cycle assessment and water use impacts of lithium production from salar deposits: Challenges and opportunities
    Halkes, Rowan T.
    Hughes, Andrew
    Wall, Frances
    Petavratzi, Evi
    Pell, Robert
    Lindsay, Jordan J.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 207
  • [34] Isolation of lignin-containing cellulose nanocrystals: life-cycle environmental impacts and opportunities for improvement
    Zargar, Shiva
    Jiang, Jungang
    Jiang, Feng
    Tu, Qingshi
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2022, 16 (01): : 68 - 80
  • [35] The environmental impacts of iron and steel industry: a life cycle assessment study
    Olmez, Gulnur Maden
    Dilek, Filiz B.
    Karanfil, Tanju
    Yetis, Ulku
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 130 : 195 - 201
  • [36] Human health impacts in the life cycle of future European electricity generation
    Treyer, Karin
    Bauer, Christian
    Simons, Andrew
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 74 : S31 - S44
  • [37] Environmental management of confectionery products: Life cycle impacts and improvement strategies
    Miah, J. H.
    Griffiths, A.
    McNeill, R.
    Halvorson, S.
    Schenker, U.
    Espinoza-Orias, N. D.
    Morse, S.
    Yang, A.
    Sadhukhan, J.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 177 : 732 - 751
  • [38] Environmental impacts of manure management based on life cycle assessment approach
    Havukainen, Jouni
    Vaisanen, Sanni
    Rantala, Tero
    Saunila, Minna
    Ukko, Juhani
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 264
  • [39] The influence of durability and recycling on life cycle impacts of window frame assemblies
    Carlisle, Stephanie
    Friedlander, Elizabeth
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (11): : 1645 - 1657
  • [40] Evaluating the environmental impacts of smart vineyards through the Life Cycle Assessment
    Tascione, Valentino
    Raggi, Andrea
    Petti, Luigia
    Manca, Gavina
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 922