Fished or farmed: Life cycle impacts of salmon consumer decisions and opportunities for reducing impacts

被引:15
|
作者
Ziegler, Friederike [1 ]
Hilborn, Ray [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] RISE Res Inst Sweden, Agr & Food, POB 5401, S-40229 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Ctr Sustaining Seafood, Seattle, WA USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Aquaculture; Fisheries; Greenhouse gas emissions; Life Cycle Assessment; LCA; Wild; Globalsalmonidproduction; PINK SALMON; PERFORMANCE; HATCHERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158591
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Salmon is a nutritious and popular food among consumers predominantly in wealthy countries around the world. Since the mid-1990s farmed salmon production has exceeded wild salmon harvest, and is now 80 % of total global salmon supply. The environmental impacts of farmed salmon are frequently discussed and consumers are faced with a multitude of choices even after deciding to have salmon for dinner: species, production method, origin, product form. We present life cycle impacts of fresh and frozen salmon products, originating in purse seine fisheries for pink salmon and gill net fisheries for sockeye salmon in Alaska, when sold on markets in Europe and the United States. Norwegian salmon products are then modelled to the same markets in fresh and frozen form, based on literature data. Impact categories included were greenhouse gas emissions, marine eutrophication, marine ecotoxicity and land use. A fish in, fish out ratio is also calculated and differences in content of nutrients and contaminants described. Frozen products from wild sockeye and pink salmon had the lowest emissions in both markets. For consumers in the U.S. and Europe, wild salmon products have 46-86 % and 12-71 % lower greenhouse gas emissions than farmed Norwegian salmon, respectively, depending on species and product form. Farmed salmon also had higher land use, marine ecotoxic and eutrophying emissions and fish in, fish out ratio. Important differences exist in nutritional and contaminant content between the three types of salmon production. Improvement options as well as an optimized supply chain are modelled showing greenhouse gas reduction opportunities of 40-50 % also for the best performing chains. Results can be used as a baseline for improved data collection and emission reductions. Recommendations for consumers, industry and policymakers who can facilitate and even drive development towards more sustainable salmon products are provided.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impacts of flexible pavement design and management decisions on life cycle energy consumption and carbon footprint
    Chong, Dan
    Wang, Yuhong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (06): : 952 - 971
  • [22] Life Cycle Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts of Advanced Vehicles
    Gao, Lin
    Winfield, Zach C.
    ENERGIES, 2012, 5 (03) : 605 - 620
  • [23] Life-cycle environmental impacts of barley straw valorisation
    Garcia-Garcia, Guillermo
    Rahimifard, Shahin
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 149 : 1 - 11
  • [24] Life Cycle Assessment to support the quantification of the environmental impacts of an event
    Toniolo, Sara
    Mazzi, Anna
    Fedele, Andrea
    Aguiari, Filippo
    Scipioni, Antonio
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 63 : 12 - 22
  • [25] Environmental impacts of the transition to automated vehicles: A life cycle perspective
    Obaid, Lubna
    Alattieh, Sara A.
    Abdallah, Mohamed
    Hamad, Khaled
    SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 38
  • [26] Life cycle environmental impacts of urban water systems in China
    Xu, Hao
    Fu, Guangtao
    Ye, Qian
    Lyu, Mei
    Yan, Xiaoyu
    WATER RESEARCH, 2024, 266
  • [27] Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Plastic Cosmetic Packaging: A Multi-Attribute Life Cycle Assessment
    Vassallo, Nicole
    Refalo, Paul
    COSMETICS, 2024, 11 (02)
  • [28] Life cycle impacts of protein-rich foods: creating robust yet extensive life cycle models for use in a consumer app
    Head, Marieke
    Sevenster, Maartje
    Odegard, Ingrid
    Krutwagen, Bart
    Croezen, Harry
    Bergsma, Geert
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 73 : 165 - 174
  • [29] How the inclusion of life cycle impacts affects transport cost-benefit analysis
    Manzo, Stefano
    Dong, Yan
    Miraglia, Simona
    Salling, Kim Bang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH, 2018, 18 (04): : 372 - 388
  • [30] Actual sources of life cycle impacts: Elementary processes and flows causing environmental impacts for a typical Brazilian building
    Belizario-Silva, Fernanda
    John, Vanderley M.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 249