A Survey of Otolaryngology Residency Programs on Adapting to the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 Transitioning to Pass/Fail

被引：1

作者：

Yang, Lydia C. ^{[1
]}

Bonner, Andrew ^{[1
]}

Patel, Om U. ^{[1
]}

Haynes, William ^{[1
]}

Burge, Kaitlin ^{[1
]}

Yadav, Ishant ^{[1
]}

Van Wagoner, Nicholas J. ^{[2
]}

Greene, Benjamin J. ^{[1
]}

Grayson, Jessica W. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Heersink Sch Med, Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA

[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Med, Heersink Sch Med, Birmingham, AL USA

来源：

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE | 2023年 / 15卷 / 09期

关键词：

clinical knowledge; united states medical licensing examination (usmle); medical student exams; otolaryngology residency; usmle step 2 ck; step; 1; change; pass/fail usmle step 1;

D O I：

10.7759/cureus.45227

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Objectives In February 2020, the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) announced that the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 licensing examination would change from a numerical score to Pass/Fail (P/F). After implementation, many believe that USMLE-Step 2-Clinical Knowledge (CK) will become an important metric for students applying to otolaryngology (ENT). The purpose of this study is to determine factors important to resident selection after these changes. Methods A survey containing 15 questions related to resident selection practices and how changing USMLE Step 1 to P/F would impact future resident selection was designed. It was distributed to all ENT residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Results Forty percent of programs responded; 66% (95% confidence interval (CI): 51.1%-78.4%) felt that changing Step 1 scoring would not lead to students being more prepared for clinical rotations; 55% believe class rank will increase in significance (95% CI: 35.7%-64.3%). There was also an increase in the importance of Step 2 CK, which had a mean ranking of 10.67 prior to changes in Step 1 scoring and increased to 7.80 after P/F. Conclusions The changes in Step 1 scoring will likely lead to increasing importance of other objective measures like class rank or Step 2 CK. This may defeat the intended purpose put forth by the NBME. Therefore, further guidance on measures correlated with student performance as a resident will be integral to the selection process.

引用

页数：9