Risk modelling of ESG (environmental, social, and governance), healthcare, and financial sectors

被引:29
作者
Chaudhry, Sajid M. [1 ]
Chen, Xihui Haviour [2 ]
Ahmed, Rizwan [3 ]
Nasir, Muhammad Ali [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Aston Business Sch, Econ Finance & Entrepreneurship Dept, Birmingham, England
[2] Heriot Watt Univ, Edinburgh Business Sch, Ctr Social & Econ Data Analyt CSEDA, Edinburgh, Scotland
[3] Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Canterbury, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Dept Econ, Leeds, England
[5] Univ Cambridge, Dept Land Econ, Cambridge, England
关键词
ecological risk modeling; ESG; extreme value theory; financial risks; healthcare risks; risk analysis; risk assessment; EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS; SYSTEMIC RISK; TAIL-RISK; MARKET; PROFITABILITY; MANAGEMENT; COUNTRIES; WAKE; US;
D O I
10.1111/risa.14195
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Climate change poses enormous ecological, socio-economic, health, and financial challenges. A novel extreme value theory is employed in this study to model the risk to environmental, social, and governance (ESG), healthcare, and financial sectors and assess their downside risk, extreme systemic risk, and extreme spillover risk. We use a rich set of global daily data of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from 1 July 1999 to 30 June 2022 in the case of healthcare and financial sectors and from 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2022 in the case of ESG sector. We find that the financial sector is the riskiest when we consider the tail index, tail quantile, and tail expected shortfall. However, the ESG sector exhibits the highest tail risk in the extreme environment when we consider a shock in the form of an ETF drop of 25% or 50%. The ESG sector poses the highest extreme systemic risk when a shock comes from China. Finally, we find that ESG and healthcare sectors have lower extreme spillover risk (contagion risk) compared to the financial sector. Our study seeks to provide valuable insights for developing sustainable economic, business, and financial strategies. To achieve this, we conduct a comprehensive risk assessment of the ESG, healthcare, and financial sectors, employing an innovative approach to risk modelling in response to ecological challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 495
页数:19
相关论文
共 83 条
[11]  
Carbon Disclosure Project, 2019, WORLDS BIGG CO FAC 1
[12]  
Chan-Lau, 2010, Financial Markets, Institutions Instruments, V19, P355, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1995499)
[13]   Tail risk and systemic risk of finance and technology (FinTech) firms [J].
Chaudhry, Sajid M. ;
Ahmed, Rizwan ;
Toan Luu Duc Huynh ;
Benjasak, Chonlakan .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 174
[14]   Investing in the healthcare sector: mutual funds or ETFs [J].
Chen, Haiwei ;
Estes, James ;
Pratt, William .
MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2018, 44 (04) :495-508
[15]   Attention to climate change and downside risk: Evidence from China [J].
Chen, Xing ;
Chen, Xian ;
Xu, Longhao ;
Wen, Fenghua .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2023, 43 (05) :1011-1031
[16]  
CLEVERLEY WO, 1978, HEALTH SERV RES, V13, P16
[17]   ESG preferences, risk and return [J].
Cornell, Bradford .
EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 27 (01) :12-19
[18]   Influential variables on the profitability of hospital companies [J].
Creixans-Tenas, Judit ;
Arimany-Serrat, Nuria .
INTANGIBLE CAPITAL, 2018, 14 (01) :171-185
[19]  
Cumperayot P. J., 2000, MEASURING RISK COMPL, P99
[20]   ESG Rating in Investment Risk Analysis of Companies Listed on the Public Market in Poland [J].
Czerwinska, Teresa ;
Kazmierkiewicz, Piotr .
ECONOMIC NOTES, 2015, 44 (02) :211-247