How do environmental tax and renewable energy contribute to ecological sustainability? New evidence from top renewable energy countries

被引:24
作者
Shayanmehr, Samira [1 ]
Radmehr, Riza [1 ]
Ali, Ernest Baba [2 ]
Ofori, Elvis Kwame [3 ]
Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday [4 ]
Gyamfi, Bright Akwasi [5 ]
机构
[1] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Dept Agr Econ, Mashhad, Iran
[2] Ural Fed Univ, Dept Environm Econ, Ekaterinburg, Russia
[3] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Management Engn, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Cyprus Int Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Business Adm, Mersin, Cyprus
[5] Istanbul Ticaret Univ, Econ & Finance Applicat & Res Ctr, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Environmental taxes; renewable energy; economic; globalization; human capital; environmental sustainability; ECONOMIC-GROWTH NEXUS; CO2; EMISSIONS; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; PANEL COINTEGRATION; QUANTILE REGRESSION; EKC HYPOTHESIS; CONSUMPTION; TESTS; ADAPTATION; INCOME;
D O I
10.1080/13504509.2023.2186961
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The recent COP27 has propelled nations towards achieving reduced environmental degradation. Governments are, therefore, required to develop effective policy tools to improve their environmental sustainability plans. In line with this, an empirical study is required to explore the all-inclusive effect of ecological sustainability policy on ecological footprint (EFP) among the world's top renewable energy consumption countries from 1994 to 2018. Recent studies on environmental degradation have focused on renewable energy while neglecting the role of environmental tax. Thus, the current study fills this gap by exploring the role of environmental tax on ecological footprint. Furthermore, the study evaluates the direct and indirect impact of environmental tax and renewable energy on different levels of EFP using the method of moment quantile regression (MMQR). The DOLS, FMOLS, and panel GMM techniques are also applied to check the robustness of the MMQR results. The empirical results indicate that environmental tax and renewable energy directly and significantly reduce the EFP; however, these impacts are insignificant in countries with lower levels of environmental pollution. Furthermore, the findings indicate that environmental tax plays a leading role in changing the energy structure towards environmentally friendly energies. The results also show that economic globalization and human capital impact ecological footprint negatively. Finally, the results suggest that GDP and nonrenewable energy aggravates ecological footprint. The study results propose insights for policymakers to mitigate environmental degradation by boosting environmental tax to deter polluters and investing more in renewable energy development.
引用
收藏
页码:650 / 670
页数:21
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] Modelling the globalization-CO2 emission nexus in Australia: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach
    Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday
    Acheampong, Alex O.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (07) : 9867 - 9882
  • [2] Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Rjoub, Husam
    Kalugina, Olga A.
    Hussain, Nazim
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 30 (04) : 595 - 605
  • [3] Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Asghar, Muhammad Mansoor
    Malik, Muhammad Nasir
    Nawaz, Kishwar
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 67
  • [4] Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: An empirical analysis
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Wang, Zhaohua
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (26) : 26782 - 26796
  • [5] Do dependence on fossil fuels and corruption spur ecological footprint?
    Akalin, Guray
    Erdogan, Sinan
    Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 90
  • [6] Ecological footprint, public-private partnership investment in energy, and financial development in Brazil: a gradual shift causality approach
    Akinsola, Gbenga Daniel
    Awosusi, Abraham Ayobamiji
    Kirikkaleli, Dervis
    Umarbeyli, Sukru
    Adeshola, Ibrahim
    Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (07) : 10077 - 10090
  • [7] Does moving towards renewable energy causes water and land inefficiency? An empirical investigation
    Al-mulali, Usama
    Solarin, Sakiru Adebola
    Sheau-Ting, Low
    Ozturk, Ilhan
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 93 : 303 - 314
  • [8] Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation
    Al-mulali, Usama
    Weng-Wai, Choong
    Sheau-Ting, Low
    Mohammed, Abdul Hakim
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 48 : 315 - 323
  • [9] Ali EB., 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, P1
  • [10] The role of technology innovation, R&D, and quality governance in pollution mitigation for EU economies: fresh evidence from method of moment quantile regression
    Ali, Ernest Baba
    Radmehr, Riza
    Shayanmehr, Samira
    Gyamfi, Bright Akwasi
    Anufriev, Valery P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2023, 30 (03) : 244 - 261