SmartGroup: A Tool for Small-Group Learning Activities

被引:1
作者
Zhu, Haining [1 ]
Li, Na [2 ]
Rai, Nitish Kumar [2 ]
Carroll, John M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stack Exchange Inc, New York, NY 10038 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, State Coll, PA 16803 USA
来源
FUTURE INTERNET | 2023年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
active learning; collaborative learning; peer assessment; peer evaluation; peer grading; appeal; team-based learning; teamwork; education technology; iterative design; meta-cognition; HIGHER-EDUCATION; PEER ASSESSMENT; ONLINE; METAANALYSIS; CHALLENGES; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.3390/fi15010007
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Small-group learning activities (SGLAs) offer varied active learning opportunities and student benefits, but higher education instructors do not universally adopt SGLAs, in part owing to management burdens. We designed and deployed the SmartGroup system, a tool-based approach to minimize instructor burdens while facilitating SGLAs and associated benefits by managing peer group formation and peer group work assessment. SmartGroup was deployed in one course over 10 weeks; iterations of SmartGroup were provided continuously to meet the instructor's needs. After deployment, the instructor and teaching assistant were interviewed, and 20 anonymous post-study survey responses were collected. The system exposed students to new perspectives, fostered meta-cognitive opportunities, and improved weaker students' performances while being predominantly well-received in terms of usability and satisfaction. Our work contributes to the literature an exploration of tool-assisted peer group work assessment in higher education and how to promote wider SGLA adoption.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [11] Brown A.L., 1996, Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems
  • [12] Implications for the Use of PowerPoint, Classroom Response Systems, Teams, and Whiteboard to Enhance Online Teaching of Chemistry Subjects in Community College
    Chiu, Wang-Kin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 97 (09) : 3135 - 3139
  • [13] Using online collaborative tools for groups to co-construct knowledge
    Chu, Samuel Kai-Wai
    Kennedy, David M.
    [J]. ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2011, 35 (04) : 581 - 597
  • [14] Clark N., 2005, Australasian conference on Computing education, P91
  • [15] Structuring Interactions for Large-Scale Synchronous Peer Learning
    Coetzee, D.
    Lim, Seongtaek
    Fox, Armando
    Hartmann, Bjoern
    Hearst, Marti A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (CSCW'15), 2015, : 1139 - 1152
  • [16] Dancy MH, 2005, AIP CONF PROC, V790, P113, DOI 10.1063/1.2084714
  • [17] Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility
    Daniel, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE MEDIA IN EDUCATION, 2012, (03):
  • [19] Thematic review of approaches to design group learning activities in higher education: The development of a comprehensive framework
    de Hei, Miranda
    Strijbos, Jan-Willem
    Sjoer, Ellen
    Admiraal, Wilfried
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2016, 18 : 33 - 45
  • [20] Deibel K., 2005, SIGCSE Bulletin, V37, P291, DOI 10.1145/1151954.1067525