Dutch professionals' discussion preferences with the parents of extremely premature infants varied, but the trend was towards shared decision-making

被引:3
作者
Geurtzen, R. [1 ,7 ]
De Proost, L. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Verhagen, A. A. E. [5 ]
Reiss, I. K. M. [3 ]
Hogeveen, M. [1 ]
Verweij, E. J. T. [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Amalia Childrens Hosp, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Neonatol,Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC Sophia Childrens Hosp, Dept Neonatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Med Eth Philosophy & Hist Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Paediat, Groningen, Netherlands
[6] LUMC, Dept Obstet, Leiden, Netherlands
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Amalia Childrens Hosp, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Neonatol,Med Ctr, Postal Box 9101,Internal Post 804, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
decision-making; ethics; extremely preterm birth; intensive care; palliative care; INTENSIVE-CARE; OUTCOMES; PRETERM;
D O I
10.1111/apa.16721
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Aim: We explored professionals' views on sharing decision-making with parents before and after an extremely preterm birth and what healthcare professionals considered severe outcomes.Methods: A nationwide, multi-centre online survey was carried out among a wide range of perinatal healthcare professionals in the Netherlands from 4 November 2020 to 10 January 2021. The medical chairs of all nine Dutch Level III and IV perinatal centres helped to disseminate the survey link.Results: We received 769 survey responses. Most respondents (53%) preferred to place equal emphasis on two treatment options during shared prenatal decision-making: early intensive care or palliative comfort care. The majority (61%) wanted to include a conditional intensive care trial as a third treatment option, but 25% disagreed. Most (78%) felt that healthcare professionals were responsible for initiating postnatal conversations to justify continuing or withdrawing neonatal intensive care if complications were associated with poor outcomes. Finally, 43% were satisfied with the current definitions of severe long-term outcomes, 41% were unsure and there were numerous for a broader definition.Conclusion: Although Dutch professionals expressed diverse preferences on how to reach decisions about extremely premature infants, we observed a trend towards shared decision-making with parents. These results could inform future guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:1200 / 1208
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]   Evaluating shared decision-making in periviable counseling using objective structured clinical examinations [J].
Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker ;
McKenzie, Fatima ;
Panoch, Janet ;
Litwiller, Abigail ;
DiCorcia, Mark J. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2019, 39 (06) :857-865
[12]   "Doctor, what would you do?": Physicians' responses to patient inquiries about periviable delivery [J].
Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker ;
McKenzie, Fatima ;
Panoch, Janet E. ;
Wocial, Lucia D. ;
Barnato, Amber E. ;
Frankel, Richard M. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2015, 98 (01) :49-54
[14]   Decision-making in imminent extreme premature births: perceived shared decision-making, parental decisional conflict and decision regret [J].
Geurtzen, R. ;
van den Heuvel, J. F. M. ;
Huisman, J. J. ;
Holzik, E. M. Lutke ;
Bekker, M. N. ;
Hogeveen, M. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2021, 41 (09) :2201-2207
[15]   Development of Nationwide Recommendations to Support Prenatal Counseling in Extreme Prematurity [J].
Geurtzen, Rosa ;
van Heijst, Arno F. J. ;
Draaisma, Jos M. T. ;
Kuijpers, Lindie J. M. K. ;
Woiski, Mallory ;
Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. ;
van Kaam, Anton H. ;
Oudijk, Martijn A. ;
Lafeber, Harrie N. ;
Bax, Caroline J. ;
Koper, Jan F. ;
Duin, Leonie K. ;
van der Hoeven, Marc A. ;
Kornelisse, Rene F. ;
Duvekot, Johannes J. ;
Andriessen, Peter ;
Heimel, Pieter J. van Runnard ;
van der Heide-Jalving, Marja ;
Bekker, Mireille N. ;
Mulder-de Tollenaer, Susanne M. ;
van Eyck, Jim ;
Eshuis-Peters, Ellis ;
Graatsma, Margo ;
Hermens, Rosella P. M. G. ;
Hogeveen, Marije .
PEDIATRICS, 2019, 143 (06)
[16]   Prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity - Insight into preferences from experienced parents [J].
Geurtzen, Rosa ;
van Heijst, Arno ;
Draaisma, Jos ;
Ouwerkerk, Laura ;
Scheepers, Hubertina ;
Hogeveen, Marije ;
Hermens, Rosetta .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (08) :1541-1549
[17]   Personalized communication with parents of children born at less than 25 weeks: Moving from doctor-driven to parent-personalized discussions [J].
Haward, Marlyse F. ;
Payot, Antoine ;
Feudtner, Chris ;
Janvier, Annie .
SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2022, 46 (02)
[18]   Measuring and communicating meaningful outcomes in neonatology: A family perspective [J].
Janvier, Annie ;
Farlow, Barbara ;
Baardsnes, Jason ;
Pearce, Rebecca ;
Barrington, Keith J. .
SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2016, 40 (08) :571-577
[19]   Ethical issues in treatment of babies born at 22 weeks of gestation [J].
Lantos, John D. .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2021, 106 (12) :1155-1157
[20]   Adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight infants with a normal head ultrasound: Prevalence and antecedents [J].
Laptook, AR ;
O'Shea, TM ;
Shankaran, S ;
Bhaskar, B .
PEDIATRICS, 2005, 115 (03) :673-680