Using computer vision, image analysis and UAVs for the automatic recognition and counting of common cranes (Grus grus)

被引:26
作者
Chen, Assaf [1 ]
Jacob, Moran [1 ]
Shoshani, Gil [1 ]
Charter, Motti [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] MIGAL Galilee Res Inst, IL-11016 Kiryat Shmona, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Shamir Res Inst, Katzrin, Israel
[3] Univ Haifa, Dept Geog & Environm Sci, Haifa, Israel
关键词
Wildlife detection and counting; Thermal imaging; Image processing; Deep learning; Remote sensing; Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE; AIRCRAFT; ACCURACY; SYSTEMS; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116948
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Long-term monitoring of wildlife numbers traditionally uses observers, which are frequently inefficient and inaccurate due to their variable experience/training, are costly and difficult to sustain over time. Furthermore, there are other inhibiting factors for wildlife counting, such as: inhabiting inaccessible areas, fear of humans, and nocturnal behavior. There is a need to develop new technologies that will automatically identify and count wild animals in order to determine the appropriate management protocol. In this study, an advanced and accurate method for automatically calculating the number of cranes (Grus grus), using thermal cameras at night and visible light (RGB) cameras during the day onboard unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), based on image analysis and computer vision, was developed. The cranes congregate at night in a large communal roost, making it possible to count the birds while they are relatively static and all together. Each bird was counted individually by creating a standardized tool to determine population numbers for management, using image analysis and automatic processing. A dedicated algorithm was developed that aimed to identify the cranes based on their spectral characteristics (typical temperature, shape, size) and to effectively separate the cranes from the typical background. The automatic segmentation and counting of roosting common cranes using UAV nighttime thermal images had an Overall Accuracy (OA) of 91.47%, User's Accuracy (UA) of 99.68%, and Producer's Accuracy (PA) of 91.74%. The computer vision and machine learning algorithm based on the YOLO v3 platform of daytime RGB UAV images of common cranes at the feeding station yielded an overall loss accuracy level of 2.25%, with a mean square error of 1.87, OA of 94.51%, UA of 99.91%, PA of 94.59%. These results are highly encouraging, and although the algorithms were developed for the purpose of counting cranes, they could be adapted for other counting purposes for wildlife management.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Automated Bird Counting with Deep Learning for Regional Bird Distribution Mapping [J].
Akcay, Huseyin Gokhan ;
Kabasakal, Bekir ;
Aksu, Duygugul ;
Demir, Nusret ;
Oz, Melih ;
Erdogan, Ali .
ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (07) :1-24
[2]   Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology [J].
Anderson, Karen ;
Gaston, Kevin J. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 11 (03) :138-146
[3]   Population dynamics of two rodent species in agro-ecosystems of central Argentina: intra-specific competition, land-use, and climate effects [J].
Andreo, Veronica ;
Lima, Mauricio ;
Provensal, Cecilia ;
Priotto, Jos ;
Polop, Jaime .
POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2009, 51 (02) :297-306
[4]   Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census [J].
Brisson-Curadeau, Emile ;
Bird, David ;
Burke, Chantelle ;
Fifield, David A. ;
Pace, Paul ;
Sherley, Richard B. ;
Elliott, Kyle H. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[5]   UAV swarm communication and control architectures: a review [J].
Campion, Mitch ;
Ranganathan, Prakash ;
Faruque, Saleh .
JOURNAL OF UNMANNED VEHICLE SYSTEMS, 2019, 7 (02) :93-106
[6]   Evaluation of an Off-the-shelf Unmanned Aircraft System for Surveying Flocks of Geese [J].
Chabot, Dominique ;
Bird, David M. .
WATERBIRDS, 2012, 35 (01) :170-174
[7]   Unmanned aircraft systems in wildlife research: current and future applications of a transformative technology [J].
Christie, Katherine S. ;
Gilbert, Sophie L. ;
Brown, Casey L. ;
Hatfield, Michael ;
Hanson, Leanne .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 14 (05) :242-252
[8]   Early detection of soil-borne diseases in field crops via remote sensing [J].
Chen, A. ;
Jacob, M. ;
Shoshani, G. ;
Dafny-Yelin, M. ;
Degani, O. ;
Rabinovitz, O. .
PRECISION AGRICULTURE'21, 2021, :217-224
[9]   A REVIEW OF ASSESSING THE ACCURACY OF CLASSIFICATIONS OF REMOTELY SENSED DATA [J].
CONGALTON, RG .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 37 (01) :35-46
[10]  
Cress B.J., 2015, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY