Large Language Models in Ophthalmology Scientific Writing: Ethical Considerations Blurred Lines or Not at All?

被引:16
作者
Salimi, Ali [1 ]
Saheb, Hady [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2023.06.004
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
& BULL; PURPOSE: To discuss the implications of large language models (LLMs) in ophthalmology research, as well as the associated ethical considerations.& BULL; DESIGN: Perspective.& BULL; METHODS: This discussion reviews the potential uses of LLMs such as ChatGPT in ophthalmology research, highlights the associated threats and ethical considera-tions, and proposes solutions for the use of LLMs in oph-thalmology research and scientific writing.& BULL; RESULTS: With the increasing interest in LLMs, such as ChatGPT, their diverse utility has been widely ex-plored, including their application in research and scien-tific writing. LLMs have the potential to guide researchers throughout the different stages of their research, from idea generation to drafting a scientific piece. However, there are significant ethical concerns and challenges re-lated to scientific integrity in ophthalmology research that should be addressed by scientific journals. Our review of the 10 highest -impact-factor ophthalmology journals re-vealed that the number of journals addressing this topic in their submission guidelines is rapidly increasing. There-fore, we propose certain domains that all journals should consider regarding the use of LLMs in research. & BULL; CONCLUSIONS: As LLMs continue to improve, their use in scientific writing will remain a contentious issue due to the ethical dilemmas involved in determining the appropriate scope of their use. This article reviews the ethical dilemmas related to the use of LLMs in ophthal-mology research and calls for the prompt development of guidelines for their ethical use in manuscript writing as ophthalmology journals update their editorial policies with respect to LLMs. (Am J Ophthalmol 2023;254: 177-181. & COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 181
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[11]  
cureus, CALL CAS REP CONT WR
[12]   ABSTRACTS WRITTEN BY CHATGPT FOOL SCIENTISTS [J].
Else, Holly .
NATURE, 2023, 613 (7944) :423-423
[13]  
Gao CA, 2022, bioRxiv, DOI [10.1101/2022.12.23.521610, 10.1101/2022.12.23.521610, DOI 10.1101/2022.12.23.521610V1, DOI 10.1101/2022.12.23.521610]
[14]   ChatGPT Is Shaping the Future of Medical Writing But Still Requires Human Judgment [J].
Kitamura, Felipe C. .
RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (02)
[15]   Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models [J].
Kung, Tiffany H. ;
Cheatham, Morgan ;
Medenilla, Arielle ;
Sillos, Czarina ;
De Leon, Lorie ;
Elepano, Camille ;
Madriaga, Maria ;
Aggabao, Rimel ;
Diaz-Candido, Giezel ;
Maningo, James ;
Tseng, Victor .
PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 2 (02)
[16]  
Kung TH, 2022, medRxiv, DOI [10.1101/2022.12.19.22283643, 10.1101/2022.12.19.22283643, DOI 10.1101/2022.12.19.22283643, 10.1101/2022.12.19.22283643v2]
[17]   Can ChatGPT draft a research article? An example of population-level vaccine effectiveness analysis [J].
Macdonald, Calum ;
Adeloye, Davies ;
Sheikh, Aziz ;
Rudan, Igor .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 13
[19]   ChatGPT is fun, but not an author [J].
Thorp, H. Holden .
SCIENCE, 2023, 379 (6630) :313-313