Large Language Models in Ophthalmology Scientific Writing: Ethical Considerations Blurred Lines or Not at All?

被引:16
作者
Salimi, Ali [1 ]
Saheb, Hady [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2023.06.004
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
& BULL; PURPOSE: To discuss the implications of large language models (LLMs) in ophthalmology research, as well as the associated ethical considerations.& BULL; DESIGN: Perspective.& BULL; METHODS: This discussion reviews the potential uses of LLMs such as ChatGPT in ophthalmology research, highlights the associated threats and ethical considera-tions, and proposes solutions for the use of LLMs in oph-thalmology research and scientific writing.& BULL; RESULTS: With the increasing interest in LLMs, such as ChatGPT, their diverse utility has been widely ex-plored, including their application in research and scien-tific writing. LLMs have the potential to guide researchers throughout the different stages of their research, from idea generation to drafting a scientific piece. However, there are significant ethical concerns and challenges re-lated to scientific integrity in ophthalmology research that should be addressed by scientific journals. Our review of the 10 highest -impact-factor ophthalmology journals re-vealed that the number of journals addressing this topic in their submission guidelines is rapidly increasing. There-fore, we propose certain domains that all journals should consider regarding the use of LLMs in research. & BULL; CONCLUSIONS: As LLMs continue to improve, their use in scientific writing will remain a contentious issue due to the ethical dilemmas involved in determining the appropriate scope of their use. This article reviews the ethical dilemmas related to the use of LLMs in ophthal-mology research and calls for the prompt development of guidelines for their ethical use in manuscript writing as ophthalmology journals update their editorial policies with respect to LLMs. (Am J Ophthalmol 2023;254: 177-181. & COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 181
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing [J].
Alkaissi, Hussam ;
McFarlane, Samy I. .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (02)
[2]  
American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2023, SCI J ED POL
[3]  
American Medical Association, JAMA OPHTHALMOL
[5]  
[Anonymous], PUBLISHING ETHICS ED
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2023, AM J OPHTHALMOLOGY G
[7]  
[Anonymous], Introducing ChatGPT.
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2023, NATURE
[9]  
[Anonymous], Instructions for Authors|Remote Sensing
[10]   ChatGPT: five priorities for research [J].
Bockting, Claudi ;
van Dis, Eva A. M. ;
Bollen, Johan ;
van Rooij, Robert ;
Zuidema, Willem L. .
NATURE, 2023, 614 (7947) :224-226