共 50 条
Anonymity in Kidney Paired Donation: A Systematic Review of Reasons
被引:1
|作者:
Marcus, Kailing
[1
]
Berner, Delphine
[1
]
Hadaya, Karine
[2
,3
]
Hurst, Samia
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Inst Ethics Hist & Humanities, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Geneva Univ Hosp, Serv Nephrol & Hypertens, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Clin Grangettes Hirslanden, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词:
ethics;
anonymity;
organ transplantation;
systematic review;
kidney paired donation;
ORGAN DONATION;
LIVING DONORS;
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS;
NONDIRECTED KIDNEY;
RECIPIENTS;
TRANSPLANTATION;
PROGRAM;
IMPLEMENTATION;
EXPERIENCE;
FAMILIES;
D O I:
10.3389/ti.2023.10913
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
The objective of this study was to investigate reasons for or against anonymity that are pertinent to kidney paired donations (KPD). We conducted a systematic review of reasons using PubMed and Google Scholar until May 2022 and through snowballing. Inclusion criteria were publications that: 1) discussed organ donation anonymity; 2) was peer-reviewed; 3) presented at least one reason on anonymity. Exclusion criteria: 1) not published in a scientific journal; 2) grey literature and dissertations. Four researchers independently reviewed and selected papers based on the criteria, extracted text passages and coded them into narrow and broad reason types, selected reasons that were valid for kidney paired donations. 50 articles were included, 62 narrow reasons (n = 24 for; n = 38 against) and 13 broad reasons were coded. Broad reasons were: protection against harm, general benefits, gratitude, curiosity, unrealistic to implement, fundamental rights, respect people's wishes, professional neutrality, timing is important, information disclosure, altruism, reciprocity and donation pool. We did not find reasons that justify legal prohibition of donor-recipient interactions for KPD, if they consented to meet. Professional counselling, follow-up and careful evaluations to prevent potential harm.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文