Content and Readability of Online Recommendations for Breast Implant Size Selection

被引:14
作者
Fanning, James E. [1 ]
Okamoto, Lauren A. [1 ]
Levine, Emma C. [2 ]
McGee, Shayan A. [3 ]
Janis, Jeffrey E. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Burlington, VT USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Hanover, NH USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Columbus, OH USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 915 Olentangy River Rd,Suite 2100, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
PATIENT EDUCATION; SOCIAL MEDIA; AUGMENTATION; INFORMATION; DECISION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000004787
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed aesthetic procedures in the United States. Online information is often used by patients to make decisions when undergoing cosmetic procedures. It is vital that online medical information includes relevant decision-making factors and uses language that is understandable to broad patient audiences. Ideally, online resources should aid patient decisions in aesthetic surgical planning, especially implant size selection for breast augmentation. We describe patient decision-making factors and readability of breast implant size selection recommended by private practice plastic surgery webpages. Methods:Using a depersonalized, anonymous query to Google search engine, the terms "breast implant size factors" and "breast implant size decision" were searched, and 52 plastic surgery private practice webpages were identified. Webpages were analyzed for reported decision-making factors of implant size selection. Readability analyses of webpages were performed with Readability Studio and Hemingway Editor. Results:The two major decision-making factors for implant size selection reported by webpages were body/tissue-based measurements and surgeon input. Ten factors related to patient lifestyle, surgical goals, and procedural options were also identified. Average webpage scores for five readability measures exceeded recommended levels for medical information. Conclusions:Reported decision-making factors for implant size selection emphasize a plastic surgeon's expertise but may enhance the patient's role in preoperative planning. Webpages describing breast implant size selection exceed the sixth and eighth grade reading levels recommended by the AMA and NIH, respectively. Improving the readability of webpages will refine the role of online medical information in preoperative planning of breast augmentation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   The Process of Breast Augmentation with Special Focus on Patient Education, Patient Selection and Implant Selection [J].
Adams, William P., Jr. ;
Small, Kevin H. .
CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2015, 42 (04) :413-+
[2]   Readability of ASPS and ASAPS Educational Web Sites: An Analysis of Consumer Impact [J].
Aliu, Oluseyi ;
Chung, Kevin C. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (04) :1271-1278
[3]  
American Medical Association, 2006, Health literacy: A manual for clinicians
[4]  
American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2022, Plastic Surgery Statistics Report
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2022, STARTPAGE PRIVATE SE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, HEMINGWAY EDITOR
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, READ STUD PROF ED 20
[8]  
Barton N., 2020, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V8, P1
[9]   Breast augmentation: Part III-epreoperative considerations and planning [J].
Berry, M. G. ;
Cucchiara, V. ;
Davies, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2011, 64 (11) :1401-1409
[10]  
Diaz JF, 2017, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V5, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001526