Multiresidue analysis of pesticides in four different pomegranate cultivars: Investigating matrix effect variability by GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS

被引:38
作者
Damale, Rahul D. [1 ,2 ]
Dutta, Anirban [3 ]
Shaikh, Nasiruddin [1 ]
Pardeshi, Anita [1 ]
Shinde, Raviraj [1 ]
Babu, K. Dhinesh [2 ]
Gaikwad, Nilesh N. [2 ]
Banerjee, Kaushik [1 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Natl Res Ctr Grapes, Natl Reference Lab, PO Manjri Farm, Pune 412307, India
[2] ICAR Natl Res Ctr Pomegranate, Solapur 413255, India
[3] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, Div Agr Chem, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
Matrix effects; Recovery; Pomegranate cultivars; Multiresidue analysis; GC-MS; MS; LC-MS; MASS-SPECTROMETRY ANALYSIS; ETHYL-ACETATE EXTRACTION; GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; LIQUID; PERFORMANCE; FRUITS; FOOD; ENHANCEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135179
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Matrix effect (ME) is unavoidable in multiresidue pesticide analysis, even when using highly advanced in-struments, and differences in MEs can affect residue analytical accuracy due to pomegranate cultivar composi-tion variations. However, literature to support this claim is limited. The study used GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS to investigate four different Indian pomegranate cultivar extracts and their MEs on multi-class pesticides. The whole fruit and arils of all cultivars were tested for 22 GC-amenable and 21 LC-amenable pesticides. Principal component analysis of the data confirmed that each cultivar had unique MEs for each pesticide. The majority of pesticides showed acute variations in recovery rates with 95% confidence, while GC-MS/MS-amenable pesticides showed more variation. Although extrapolative dilution reduced the influence of MEs on analytical accuracy, a generalized matrix-matching for all cultivars was not possible to achieve. To reduce the variability in MEs, it is recommended that a cultivar-specific matrix-matched standard should be used.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Validation and uncertainty analysis of a multi-residue method for pesticides in grapes using ethyl acetate extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J].
Baneriee, Kaushik ;
Oulkar, Dasharath P. ;
Dasgupta, Soma ;
Patil, Shubhangi B. ;
Patil, Sangrarn H. ;
Savant, Rahul ;
Adsule, Pandurang G. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2007, 1173 (1-2) :98-109
[2]   Matrix Effects and Interferences of Different Citrus Fruit Coextractives in Pesticide Residue Analysis Using Ultrahigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry [J].
Besil, Natalia ;
Cesio, Veronica ;
Heinzen, Horacio ;
Fernandez-Alba, Amadeo R. .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2017, 65 (23) :4819-4829
[3]   Quantification of pesticides in food crops using QuEChERS approaches and GC-MS/MS [J].
Cho, Jimi ;
Lee, Jonghwa ;
Lim, Chai-Uk ;
Ahn, Jongsung .
Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-Chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment, 2016, 33 (12) :1803-1816
[4]   INFLUENCE OF THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF EXTRACTS FROM DIFFERENT MATRICES IN THE PESTICIDE CHROMATOGRAPHIC RESPONSE. [J].
de Pinho, Gevany Paulino ;
Silverio, Flaviano Oliveira ;
Neves, Antonio Augusto ;
Queiroz, Maria Eliana L. R. ;
Starling, Maria Antonia V. M. .
QUIMICA NOVA, 2010, 33 (04) :909-913
[5]   Evaluation of matrix effect on the GC response of eleven pesticides by PCA [J].
de Sousa, Flaviane Aparecida ;
Guido Costa, Anna Isabel ;
Lopes Ribeiro de Queiroz, Maria Eliana ;
Teofilo, Reinaldo Francisco ;
Neves, Antonio Augusto ;
de Pinho, Gevany Paulino .
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2012, 135 (01) :179-185
[6]  
Erney DR, 1997, HRC-J HIGH RES CHROM, V20, P375, DOI 10.1002/jhrc.1240200706
[7]   Overcoming matrix effects using the dilution approach in multiresidue methods for fruits and vegetables [J].
Ferrer, Carmen ;
Lozano, Ana ;
Agueera, Ana ;
Giron, A. Jimenez ;
Fernandez-Alba, A. R. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2011, 1218 (42) :7634-7639
[8]   Matrix-Matching as an Improvement Strategy for the Detection of Pesticide Residues [J].
Giacinti, Geraldine ;
Raynaud, Christine ;
Capblancq, Sophie ;
Simon, Valerie .
JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2016, 81 (05) :T1342-T1350
[9]  
Gómez-Ramos MD, 2016, ANAL METHODS-UK, V8, P4664, DOI [10.1039/c6ay00436a, 10.1039/C6AY00436A]
[10]   Matrix effects in (ultra)trace analysis of pesticide residues in food and biotic matrices [J].
Hajslová, J ;
Zrostlíková, J .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2003, 1000 (1-2) :181-197