Striving toward Community-Engaged and Participatory Methods: Considerations for Researchers in Academic Settings

被引:2
|
作者
Narendorf, Sarah C. [1 ,2 ]
Ali, Samira [3 ]
Lea III, Charles H. [4 ]
Pritzker, Suzanne [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Grad Coll Social Work, social work, 110 HA Social Work Bldg, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[2] Univ Houston, Grad Coll Social Work, Res & Fac Dev, 110 HA Social Work Bldg, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[3] Univ Houston, Grad Coll Social Work, Houston, TX USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Sch Social Work, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Houston, Grad Coll Social Work, Houston, TX USA
关键词
academia; community-engaged methods; domain of power; participatory methods; SOCIAL-WORK; PUBLIC IMPACT; HEALTH; INTERSECTIONALITY; SCHOLARSHIP; PERSPECTIVES; POWER; MODEL; TOOL;
D O I
10.1093/swr/svac029
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Community-engaged and participatory methods are increasingly used by academic researchers. Power dynamics in academia shape the landscape in which researchers implement these methods, yet are rarely understood and intentionally addressed. Through the lens of social work researchers at different career stages, this article describes how power relations within academia present challenges to community-engaged and participatory research across four stages of the research process (participant/researcher relationship, study formulation, conducting research, and publication/dissemination). These challenges are located within four domains of power identified by intersectionality scholars: Institutional policies such as those for tenure and promotion and for research administration presented challenges with the structural domain. Decisions about how to implement and enforce policies and operationalize what counts for tenure and promotion were identified as challenges within the disciplinary domain. Norms about who belongs on a university campus and what types of research are valued exemplified the cultural domain, while dynamics about who is viewed as an expert exemplified challenges the interpersonal domain. Across the research process, the article identifies potential solutions and suggests strategies for intentional consideration by academic researchers and their institutions to conduct meaningful, inclusive, and socially just research that shares power with community.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 74
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [21] Participatory mapping in low-resource settings: Three novel methods used to engage Kenyan youth and other community members in community-based HIV prevention research
    Green, Eric P.
    Warren, Virginia Rieck
    Broverman, Sherryl
    Ogwang, Benson
    Puffer, Eve S.
    GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 11 (5-6) : 583 - 599
  • [22] Short-Form HIV Disability Questionnaire Sensibility, Utility, and Implementation Considerations in Community-Based Settings: A Mixed Methods Study
    O'Brien, Kelly K.
    Ibanez-Carrasco, Francisco
    Solomon, Patricia
    Carusone, Soo Chan
    Stewart, Ann
    Bayoumi, Ahmed M.
    Brown, Darren A.
    Quigley, Adria
    Ahluwalia, Puja
    Erlandson, Kristine M.
    Vera, Jaime H.
    Bergin, Colm
    Hanna, Steven E.
    Swinton, Marilyn
    Torres, Brittany
    Mcduff, Kiera
    Da Silva, George
    Bradford, Glen
    Islam, Shaz
    Price, Colleen
    Lindsay, Joanne D.
    Murray, Carolann
    Mcclellan, Natalia
    Krizmancic, Katrina
    Anand, Praney
    Yates, Tammy
    Turje, Rosalind Baltzer
    Mcdougall, Patrick
    Maksimcev, Vladislava Vlatka
    Harding, Richard
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PROVIDERS OF AIDS CARE, 2023, 22