A comprehensive analysis of acknowledgement texts in Web of Science: a case study on four scientific domains

被引:13
作者
Smirnova, Nina [1 ]
Mayr, Philipp [1 ]
机构
[1] GESIS Leibniz Inst Social Sci, Unter Sachsenhausen 6-8, D-50667 Cologne, Germany
关键词
Acknowledgements; Web of Science; Acknowledged entities; Named entity recognition;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-022-04554-9
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Analysis of acknowledgments is particularly interesting as acknowledgments may give information not only about funding, but they are also able to reveal hidden contributions to authorship and the researcher's collaboration patterns, context in which research was conducted, and specific aspects of the academic work. The focus of the present research is the analysis of a large sample of acknowledgement texts indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection. Record types "article" and "review" from four different scientific domains, namely social sciences, economics, oceanography and computer science, published from 2014 to 2019 in a scientific journal in English were considered. Six types of acknowledged entities, i.e., funding agency, grant number, individuals, university, corporation and miscellaneous, were extracted from the acknowledgement texts using a named entity recognition tagger and subsequently examined. A general analysis of the acknowledgement texts showed that indexing of funding information in WoS is incomplete. The analysis of the automatically extracted entities revealed differences and distinct patterns in the distribution of acknowledged entities of different types between different scientific domains. A strong association was found between acknowledged entity and scientific domain, and acknowledged entity and entity type. Only negligible correlation was found between the number of citations and the number of acknowledged entities. Generally, the number of words in the acknowledgement texts positively correlates with the number of acknowledged funding organizations, universities, individuals and miscellaneous entities. At the same time, acknowledgement texts with the larger number of sentences have more acknowledged individuals and miscellaneous categories.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 734
页数:26
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Akbik A, 2018, P 27 INT C COMP LING, P1638
[2]  
Akbik A, 2019, NAACL HLT 2019: THE 2019 CONFERENCE OF THE NORTH AMERICAN CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS: HUMAN LANGUAGE TECHNOLOGIES: PROCEEDINGS OF THE DEMONSTRATIONS SESSION, P54
[3]  
Alexandera D., 2021, BIR 2021 11 INT WORK, P102
[4]   Funding acknowledgements in scientific publications: A literature review [J].
Alvarez-Bornstein, Belen ;
Montesi, Michela .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2020, 29 (04) :469-488
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, The scholars courtesy: The role of acknowledgements in the primary communication process
[6]   Normative versus strategic accounts of acknowledgment data: The case of the top-five journals of economics [J].
Baccini, Alberto ;
Petrovich, Eugenio .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2022, 127 (01) :603-635
[7]  
Cronin B., 1995, REV ESP DOC CIENT, V18, P172, DOI DOI 10.3989/REDC.1995.V18.I2.654
[8]   Making visible the invisible through the analysis of acknowledgements in the humanities [J].
Diaz-Faes, Adrian A. ;
Bordons, Maria .
ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2017, 69 (05) :576-590
[9]   Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing [J].
Giles, CL ;
Councill, IG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (51) :17599-17604
[10]   An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output [J].
Hirsch, JE .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (46) :16569-16572