The least-cost abatement measure of carbon emissions for China's glass manufacturing industry based on the marginal abatement costs

被引:4
作者
Xian, Yujiao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hu, Zhihui [1 ]
Wang, Ke [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, Ctr Sustainable Dev & Energy Policy Res, Sch Energy & Min Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Min & Technol, State Key Lab Coal Resources & Safe Min, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Sustainable Dev Res Inst Econ & Soc Beijing, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Beijing Key Lab Energy Econ & Environm Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon emission abatement measure; Marginal abatement cost curve; Least alternative cost; Parametric directional distance function; Carbon trading market; CO2; EMISSIONS; SHADOW PRICES; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; POLLUTION; SECTOR; STEEL; IRON; TECHNOLOGIES; SO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2023.129159
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
We estimate the marginal abatement cost (MAC) curve of carbon emissions for China's glass production firms through combining the top-down economic method and the bottom-up engineering method. An economic model based on parametric directional distance function is first used to estimate the least MAC, and then, from the perspective of the engineering method, the emission abatement level is further incorporated to identify the MAC curve of carbon emissions. In addition, this study takes multiple abatement measures into account by either downscaling the production activity or enlarging the inputs use. The results show that: (i) The average MAC of carbon emissions for China's glass production firms ranges from 552 to 6571 CNY/t CO2 operating in 2008-2015. (ii) The firms with higher main business income are usually associated with lower MAC of carbon emissions. (iii) Increasing the intermediate input is considered as the least-cost abatement measure for the large and medium sized firms, while downscaling the production activity is the optimal one for small sized firms. (iv) The regional carbon emission permit trading scheme would help China's glass manufacturing industry save 42-62% abatement costs for achieving the emission reduction targets of 5-30%, while nationwide scheme would help save additional 8% abatement costs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] AIGNER DJ, 1968, AM ECON REV, V58, P826
  • [2] Does technological innovation really reduce marginal abatement costs? Some theory, algebraic evidence, and policy implications
    Bauman, Yoram
    Lee, Myunghun
    Seeley, Karl
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 40 (04) : 507 - 527
  • [3] Performance-based environmental index weights: Are all metrics created equal?
    Bellenger, Moriah J.
    Herlihy, Alan T.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (05) : 1043 - 1050
  • [4] Worldwide carbon shadow prices during 1990-2011
    Boussemart, Jean-Philippe
    Leleu, Herve
    Shen, Zhiyang
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 109 : 288 - 296
  • [5] CAIGA, 2022, China architectural and industrial glass association
  • [6] CEADs, 2021, China emission accounts and datasets
  • [7] Adjusted carbon intensity in China: Trend, driver, and network
    Chen, Jiandong
    Xu, Chong
    Huang, Shuo
    Shen, Zhiyang
    Song, Malin
    Wang, Shiqi
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 251
  • [8] Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure
    Choi, Yongrok
    Zhang, Ning
    Zhou, P.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 98 : 198 - 208
  • [9] CNBS, 2017, Statistical division on large, medium and small micro enterprises
  • [10] Forward-looking assessment of the GHG abatement cost: Application to China
    Dai, Sheng
    Zhou, Xun
    Kuosmanen, Timo
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 88 (88)