Experimental Study on Wind Load and Wind-Induced Interference Effect of Three High-Rise Buildings

被引:4
作者
Cui, H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
An, H. [4 ]
Ma, M. [4 ]
Hani, Z. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Saha, S. C. [5 ]
Liu, Q. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shijiazhuang Tiedao Univ, State Key Lab Mech Behav & Syst Safety Traff Engn, Shijiazhuang 050043, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Innovat Ctr Wind Engn & Wind Energy Technol Hebei, Shijiazhuang 050043, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Shijiazhuang Tiedao Univ, Dept Math & Phys, Shijiazhuang 050043, Hebei, Peoples R China
[4] Shijiazhuang Tiedao Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Shijiazhuang 050043, Hebei, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & Informat Technol, Sch Mech & Mechatron Engn, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Base moment coefficient; Fluctuating wind pressure coefficients; Interference effect; Pyramidal group of buildings; Shape coefficients; Wind tunnel test;
D O I
10.47176/jafm.16.11.1897
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Wind loads of high-rise buildings are a key parameter in architectural design. The magnitude and distribution characteristics of wind loads are of great importance for the safety and economy of structural design. The wind loads of high-rise buildings are quite different from those of monomer buildings. The wind-induced interference effect could significantly increase the local wind pressure of buildings, causing potential safety hazards for the main structure and enclosure structure. For the three common high-rise buildings, we adopted the wind tunnel test method to measure the surface pressure of each building. The corresponding Re number was 8.2x10(6). This paper studied the shape coefficients, fluctuating wind pressure coefficients and base bending moment coefficient of each building with different wind direction angles and different spacing ratios, and the maximum value of each parameter and the corresponding working condition were statistically analyzed. The results showed that, under any wind direction angle, the fluctuating wind pressure coefficients on all sides of the building were affected by the spacing ratio, and the fluctuation range was large. When the wind angle was 180 degrees, the fluctuating wind pressure coefficients on the sides of Building 1 were most affected by the slope ratio. At this wind angle, the maximum value was 0.43 at a slope ratio of 5.0, which was 65% different from the minimum. Partition shape coefficients of some sides and top surfaces changed significantly with the spacing ratio. When the spacing ratio was 5.0, the base bending moment coefficients in the downwind and crosswind directions reached their maximum values, and the wind direction angles where the maximum values of the base bending moment coefficients in the downwind direction were 40 degrees and 50 degrees, respectively, and the wind direction angle where the maximum value of the base bending moment coefficients in the crosswind direction was 10 degrees. Due to the influence of the wind angle and the building spacing ratio, the wind loads on the facades of the pyramidal group of buildings varied greatly, and the wind-induced interference effect was evident. The wind load between the building facades in the three buildings was different, and the wind disturbance effect was evident. Therefore, the most unfavorable stress state and interference state of the structure should be comprehensively considered in the wind resistance design of the three buildings. The building spacing ratio should preferably be set to 3.0, and wind angles of 10 degrees, 40 degrees, and 50 degrees should be avoided whenever possible.
引用
收藏
页码:2101 / 2114
页数:14
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GB50009 Load code for the design of building structures
[2]   Study of wind loads on rectangular plan tall building under interference condition [J].
Chauhan, Bharat Singh ;
Chakrabarti, Anupam ;
Ahuja, Ashok Kumar .
STRUCTURES, 2022, 43 :105-130
[3]  
Chunyan L., 2011, Journal Huaqiao University (Natural Science,), V32, P87
[4]  
Deqian Z., 2011, Journal of Vibration and Shock, V35, P96, DOI [10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2011.05.046, DOI 10.13465/J.CNKI.JVS.2011.05.046]
[5]  
[杜荣强 Du Rongqiang], 2022, [建筑科学, Building Science], V38, P103
[6]  
[黄东梅 Huang Dongmei], 2012, [土木工程学报, China Civil Engineering Journal], V45, P1
[7]  
Huaying W., 2015, Journal of East China Jiaotong University, V32, P103, DOI [10.16749/j.cnki.jecjtu.2015.02.014, DOI 10.16749/J.CNKI.JECJTU.2015.02.014]
[8]  
Kunyang L, 2021, Journal of Hunan City University (Natural Science), V30, P1, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1672-7304.2021.06.0001, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-7304.2021.06.0001]
[9]   Interference effects on wind loading of a row of closely spaced tall buildings [J].
Lam, K. M. ;
Leung, M. Y. H. ;
Zhao, J. G. .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2008, 96 (05) :562-583
[10]  
Liguo Y., 2021, Building Science, V37, P48, DOI [10.13614/j.cnki.1962/tu.2019.07.011, DOI 10.13614/J.CNKI.1962/TU.2019.07.011]