A systematic review of studies reporting the development of core outcome sets for use in routine care

被引:10
|
作者
Kearney, Anna [1 ,4 ]
Gargon, Elizabeth [1 ]
Mitchell, James W. [2 ]
Callaghan, Stephen [3 ]
Yameen, Farheen [3 ]
Williamson, Paula R. [1 ]
Dodd, Susanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Hlth Data Sci, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Syst Mol & Integrat Biol, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, NIHR, ARC, NWC, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[4] Univ Liverpool, Hlth Data Sci, Block F Waterhouse Bldg,1-5 Brownlow St, Liverpool L69 3GL, Lancashire, England
关键词
Core outcome sets; Routine care; Healthcare evaluation; Health outcomes; COMET; Clinical audit; Value -based healthcare; Patient; -centered; outcome measures; CLINICAL-TRIALS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.011
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Core outcome sets (COS) represent the minimum health outcomes to be measured for a given health condition. Interest is growing in using COS within routine care to support delivery of patient-focused care. This review aims to systematically map COS developed for routine care to understand their scope, stakeholder involvement, and development methods.Methods: Medline (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science Core collection were searched for studies reporting development of COS for routine care. Data on scope, methods, and stakeholder groups were analyzed in subgroups defined by setting.Results: Screening 25,301 records identified 262 COS: 164 for routine care only and 98 for routine care and research. Nearly half of the COS (112/254, 44%) were developed with patients, alongside input from experts in registries, insurance, legal, outcomes measurement, and performance management. Research publications were often searched to generate an initial list of outcomes (115/198, 58%) with few searching routine health records (47/198, 24%).Conclusion: An increasing number of COS is being developed for routine care. Although involvement of patient stakeholders has increased in recent years, further improvements are needed. Methodology and scope are broadly similar to COS for research but implementation of the final set is a greater consideration during development.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of a core outcome set for use in routine orthodontic clinical trials
    Tsichlaki, Aliki
    O'Brien, Kevin
    Benson, Philip E.
    Marshman, Zoe
    Johal, Ama
    Colonio-Salazar, Fiorella B.
    Harman, Nicola L.
    Fleming, Padhraig S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 158 (05) : 650 - 660
  • [22] Variation in outcome reporting in studies on obesity in pregnancy-A systematic review
    Dadouch, Rachel
    Faheim, Mina
    Susini, Orsolina
    Sedra, Silvana
    Showell, Marian
    D'Souza, Rohan
    Kingdom, John
    Parsons, Janet
    Maxwell, Cynthia
    Windrim, Rory
    CLINICAL OBESITY, 2019, 9 (06)
  • [23] Study found increasing use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews and identified facilitators and barriers
    Saldanha, Ian J.
    Hughes, Karen L.
    Dodd, Susanna
    Lasserson, Toby
    Kirkham, Jamie J.
    Wu, Yuhui
    Lucas, Samuel W.
    Williamson, Paula R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 169
  • [24] Outcome Reporting Variability in Trials of Chinese Medicine for Hyperlipidemia: A Systematic Review for Developing a Core Outcome Set
    Li, Geng
    Han, Ruxue
    Cao, Wencong
    Wen, Zehuai
    Chen, Xiankun
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 2021
  • [25] Assessment of the methodological quality of studies on core outcome sets for respiratory diseases: A systematic review and meta-research study
    Liu, Mengjuan
    Wang, Jiajia
    Wang, Lu
    Zhang, Xinyi
    Hao, Ruiyu
    Wang, Duolao
    Chen, Tao
    Li, Jiansheng
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [26] Developing Core Outcome Sets (COS) and Core Outcome Measures Sets (COMS) in Cosmetic Gynecological Interventions: Protocol for a Development and Usability Study
    Doumouchtsis, Stergios K.
    Nama, Vivek
    Falconi, Gabriele
    Rada, Maria Patricia
    Manonai, Jittima
    Iancu, George
    Haddad, Jorge Milhem
    Betschart, Cornelia
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (11):
  • [27] Core domain and outcome measurement sets for shoulder pain trials are needed: systematic review of physical therapy trials
    Page, Matthew J.
    McKenzie, Joanne E.
    Green, Sally E.
    Beaton, Dorcas E.
    Jain, Nitin B.
    Lenza, Mario
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    Surace, Stephen
    Deitch, Jessica
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (11) : 1270 - 1281
  • [28] Core outcome sets for use in effectiveness trials involving people with bipolar and schizophrenia in a community-based setting (PARTNERS2): study protocol for the development of two core outcome sets
    Keeley, Thomas
    Khan, Humera
    Pinfold, Vanessa
    Williamson, Paula
    Mathers, Jonathan
    Davies, Linda
    Sayers, Ruth
    England, Elizabeth
    Reilly, Siobhan
    Byng, Richard
    Gask, Linda
    Clark, Mike
    Huxley, Peter
    Lewis, Peter
    Birchwood, Maximillian
    Calvert, Melanie
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [29] Outcome Reporting in Randomized Trials for Shoulder Disorders: Literature Review to Inform the Development of a Core Outcome Set
    Page, Matthew J.
    Huang, Hsiaomin
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    Gagnier, Joel J.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2018, 70 (02) : 252 - 259
  • [30] Core outcome sets in cancer and their approaches to identifying and selecting patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review
    Ramsey, Imogen
    Eckert, Marion
    Hutchinson, Amanda D.
    Marker, Julie
    Corsini, Nadia
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)