A systematic review of studies reporting the development of core outcome sets for use in routine care

被引:10
|
作者
Kearney, Anna [1 ,4 ]
Gargon, Elizabeth [1 ]
Mitchell, James W. [2 ]
Callaghan, Stephen [3 ]
Yameen, Farheen [3 ]
Williamson, Paula R. [1 ]
Dodd, Susanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Hlth Data Sci, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Syst Mol & Integrat Biol, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, NIHR, ARC, NWC, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[4] Univ Liverpool, Hlth Data Sci, Block F Waterhouse Bldg,1-5 Brownlow St, Liverpool L69 3GL, Lancashire, England
关键词
Core outcome sets; Routine care; Healthcare evaluation; Health outcomes; COMET; Clinical audit; Value -based healthcare; Patient; -centered; outcome measures; CLINICAL-TRIALS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.011
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Core outcome sets (COS) represent the minimum health outcomes to be measured for a given health condition. Interest is growing in using COS within routine care to support delivery of patient-focused care. This review aims to systematically map COS developed for routine care to understand their scope, stakeholder involvement, and development methods.Methods: Medline (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science Core collection were searched for studies reporting development of COS for routine care. Data on scope, methods, and stakeholder groups were analyzed in subgroups defined by setting.Results: Screening 25,301 records identified 262 COS: 164 for routine care only and 98 for routine care and research. Nearly half of the COS (112/254, 44%) were developed with patients, alongside input from experts in registries, insurance, legal, outcomes measurement, and performance management. Research publications were often searched to generate an initial list of outcomes (115/198, 58%) with few searching routine health records (47/198, 24%).Conclusion: An increasing number of COS is being developed for routine care. Although involvement of patient stakeholders has increased in recent years, further improvements are needed. Methodology and scope are broadly similar to COS for research but implementation of the final set is a greater consideration during development.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Synthesizing Core Outcome Sets for outcomes research in cohort studies: a systematic review
    Musgrove, Erica
    Gasparini, Loretta
    McBain, Katie
    Clifford, Susan A.
    Carter, Simon A.
    Teede, Helena
    Wake, Melissa
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2022, 92 (04) : 936 - 945
  • [2] A review of patient and carer participation and the use of qualitative research in the development of core outcome sets
    Jones, Janet E.
    Jones, Laura L.
    Keeley, Thomas J. H.
    Calvert, Melanie J.
    Mathers, Jonathan
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [3] Synthesis of temporomandibular disorders management intervention outcomes for development of core outcome sets: A systematic review
    Ferreira, N. R.
    Marto, C. M.
    de Sousa, B. M.
    Loureiro, M.
    Oliveira, A. T.
    Dossantos, M. F.
    Rodrigues, M. J.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 51 (07) : 1303 - 1319
  • [4] Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review
    Sabet, Tamer S.
    Anderson, David B.
    Stubbs, Peter W.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    Gagnier, Joel
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [5] A review of core outcome sets (COS) developed for different settings finds there is a subset of outcomes relevant for both research and routine care
    Kearney, Anna
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Dodd, Susanna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 173
  • [6] Pain and physical function are common core domains across 40 core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review
    Sabet, Tamer S.
    Anderson, David B.
    Stubbs, Peter W.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    Gagnier, Joel
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2025, 180
  • [7] A systematic review of core outcome set development studies demonstrates difficulties in defining unique outcomes
    Young, Amber E.
    Brookes, Sara T.
    Avery, Kerry N. L.
    Davies, Anna
    Metcalfe, Chris
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 115 : 14 - 24
  • [8] Outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the pharmacological management of idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) in women; a systematic review for the development of core outcome sets (COS)
    Moussa, Reem
    Rada, Maria Patricia
    Durnea, Constantin
    Falconi, Gabriele
    Betschart, Cornelia
    Haddad, Jorge Milhem
    Sedgwick, Philip
    Doumouchtsis, Stergios K.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (05) : 1243 - 1250
  • [9] Outcome reporting in trials on conservative interventions for pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review for the development of a core outcome set
    Khan, Kimmee
    Rada, Maria
    Elfituri, Abdullatif
    Betschart, Cornelia
    Falconi, Gabriele
    Haddad, Jorge Milhem
    Doumouchtsis, Stergios K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 268 : 100 - 109
  • [10] Outcomes reporting in systematic reviews on surgical endodontics: A scoping review for the development of a core outcome set
    Shah, Pratik Kamalkant
    El Karim, Ikhlas
    Duncan, Henry F.
    Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu
    Chong, Bun San
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2022, 55 (08) : 811 - 832