Mesenchymal stem cells transplantation for perianal fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

被引:24
|
作者
Wang, H. [1 ]
Jiang, H. Y. [2 ]
Zhang, Y. X. [3 ]
Jin, H. Y. [4 ]
Fei, B. Y. [4 ]
Jiang, J. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Sci Res Ctr, China Japan Union Hosp, Changchun, Peoples R China
[2] Life Spring AKY Pharmaceut, Changchun, Peoples R China
[3] Changchun Univ Chinese Med, Changchun, Peoples R China
[4] Jilin Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Colorectal Surg, China Japan Union Hosp, Changchun, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Perianal fistulas; Mesenchymal stem cells transplantation; Clinical trials; Randomised controlled trial; Systematic review and meta-analysis; Healing rate; Efficacy and safety; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; CROHNS-DISEASE; IN-ANO; FECAL INCONTINENCE; ANAL FISTULA; EFFICACY; SAFETY; THERAPY; POTENCY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1186/s13287-023-03331-6
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPerianal fistulas, characterised as granulomatous inflammation of fistulas around the anal canal, are associated with significant morbidity resulting in a negative impact on quality of life and a tremendous burden to the healthcare system. Treatment of anal fistulas usually consists of anal surgery; however, results of closure rates are not satisfactory especially with complex perianal fistulas, after which many patients may suffer from anal incontinence. Recently, the administration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has shown promising efficacy. Herein, we aim to explore whether MSCs are effective for complex perianal fistulas and if they have either short-term, medium-term, long-term or over-long-term efficacy. Additionally, we want to elucidate whether factors such as drug dosage, MSC source, cell type, and disease aetiology influence treatment efficacy.Main body of the abstractWe searched four online databases and analysed data based on information within the clinical trials registry. The outcomes of eligible trials were analysed with Review Manager 5.4.1. Relative risk and related 95% confidence interval were calculated to compare the effect between the MSCs and control groups. In addition, the Cochrane risk of bias tool was applied to evaluate the bias risk of eligible studies. Meta-analyses showed that therapy with MSCs was superior to conventional treatment for complex perianal fistulas in short-, long- and over-long-term follow-up phases. However, there was no statistical difference in treatment efficacy in the medium term between the two methods. Subgroup meta-analyses showed factors including cell type, cell source and cell dosage were superior compared to the control, but there was no significant difference between different experimental groups of those factors. Besides, local MSCs therapy has shown more promising results for fistulas as a result of Crohn's Disease (CD). Although we tend to maintain that MSCs therapy is effective for cryptoglandular fistulas equally, more studies are needed to confirm this conclusion in the future.Short conclusionMSCs Transplantation could be a new therapeutic method for complex perianal fistulas of both cryptoglandular and CD origin showing high efficacy in the short-term to over-long-term phases, as well as high efficacy in sustained healing. The difference in cell types, cell sources and cell dosages did not influence MSCs' efficacy.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Co-transplantation of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kallekleiv, Merete
    Larun, Lillebeth
    Bruserud, Oystein
    Hatfield, Kimberley Joanne
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2016, 18 (02) : 172 - 185
  • [32] Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells therapy in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lu, Wenming
    Yan, Longxiang
    Tang, Xingkun
    Wang, Xuesong
    Du, Jing
    Zou, Zhengwei
    Li, Lincai
    Ye, Junsong
    Zhou, Lin
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [33] Tissue-source effect on mesenchymal stem cells as living biodrugs for heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Safwan, Moaz
    Bourgleh, Mariam Safwan
    Aldoush, Mohamed
    Haider, Khawaja Husnain
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 16 (08):
  • [34] Preclinical and Clinical Amelioration of Bone Fractures with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yi, Hanxiao
    Wang, Yang
    Liang, Qunying
    Mao, Xiaoqun
    CELL TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 31
  • [35] Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Qin, Jinlv
    Wang, Guizuo
    Han, Dong
    STEM CELL REVIEWS AND REPORTS, 2024, 20 (04) : 931 - 937
  • [36] Effect of mesenchymal stromal cells transplantation on the outcomes of patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xie, Rong-hui
    Gong, Shi-guo
    Song, Jiao
    Wu, Ping-ping
    Hu, Wen-Long
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2024, 42 (04) : 753 - 768
  • [37] Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Islam, Md Asiful
    Alam, Sayeda Sadia
    Kundu, Shoumik
    Ahmed, Saleh
    Sultana, Shabiha
    Patar, Azim
    Hossan, Tareq
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (19)
  • [38] Clinical Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Bone Regeneration in Oral Implantology. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Egido-Moreno, Sonia
    Valls-Roca-Umbert, Joan
    Manuel Cespedes-Sanchez, Juan
    Lopez-Lopez, Jose
    Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (03) : 1 - 12
  • [39] Dry needling for orofacial pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Kuzdzal, Adrian
    Ernst, Edzard
    Posadzki, Pawel
    Wronski, Zbigniew
    PAIN REPORTS, 2024, 9 (06)
  • [40] Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation as an effective treatment strategy for ischemic stroke in Asia: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
    Xue, Ping
    Wang, Min
    Yan, Guanhua
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, 14 : 909 - 928