Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of radezolid against Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates from China

被引:7
作者
Wang, Cong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xiong, Yanpeng [1 ,2 ]
Bao, Chai [4 ]
Wei, Ying [3 ,5 ]
Wen, Zewen [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Xinyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yu, Zhijian [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Xiangbing [1 ,2 ]
Li, Guiqiu [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Deng, Qiwen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen Key Lab Endogenous Infect, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Shenzhen Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Jiamusi Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Microbiol, Jiamusi, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Shenzhen Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Heilongjiang Med Serv Management Evaluat Ctr, Harbin, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[6] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Qual Control Ctr Hosp Infect Management Shenzhen, Union Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
radezolid; Staphylococcus aureus; biofilm; quantitative proteomics; RT-PCR; SUBINHIBITORY CONCENTRATIONS; RESISTANCE; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.3389/fmicb.2023.1131178
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Although the potent antibacterial ability of radezolid against Staphylococcus aureus has been widely reported worldwide, its antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity against the S. aureus clinical isolates from China remains elusive. In this study, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of radezolid was determined in S. aureus clinical isolates from China using the agar dilution method, and the relationship between radezolid susceptibility and ST distribution was also investigated. The anti-biofilm activity of radezolid against S. aureus was determined by a crystal violet assay and compared with that of linezolid and contezolid. The quantitative proteomics of S. aureus treated with radezolid was analyzed, and the genetic mutations in radezolid-induced resistant S. aureus were determined by whole-genome sequencing. The dynamic changes in transcriptional expression levels of several biofilm-related genes were analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR. Our data showed that radezolid MIC ranged from <= 0.125 to 0.5 mg/L, which was almost 1/4 x MIC of linezolid against S. aureus, indicating the greater antibacterial activity of radezolid than linezolid. The S. aureus clinical isolates with radezolid MICs of 0.5 mg/L were most widely distributed in ST239 of MRSA and ST7 of MSSA. Moreover, the more robust anti-biofilm activity of radezolid with subinhibitory concentrations (1/8 x MIC and 1/16 x MIC) was demonstrated against S. aureus when compared with that of contezolid and linezolid. Genetic mutations were found in glmS, 23S rRNA, and DUF1542 domain-containing protein in radezolid-induced resistant S. aureus selected by in vitro induction of drug exposure. Quantitative proteomic analysis of S. aureus indicated that the global expression of some biofilm-related and virulence-related proteins was downregulated. Quantitative RT-PCR further confirmed that the expressions of some downregulated biofilm-related proteins, including sdrD, carA, sraP, hlgC, sasG, spa, sspP, fnbA, and oatA, were decreased after 12 h and 24 h of exposure to radezolid. Conclusively, radezolid shows robust antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity against S. aureus clinical isolates from China when compared with contezolid and linezolid.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin in biofilm: structural and regulatory aspects [J].
Arciola, Carla Renata ;
Campoccia, Davide ;
Ravaioli, Stefano ;
Montanaro, Lucio .
FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 5
[2]   Effect of tedizolid on clinical Enterococcus isolates: in vitro activity, distribution of virulence factor, resistance genes and multilocus sequence typing [J].
Bai, Bing ;
Hu, Kaitao ;
Li, Hui ;
Yao, Weiming ;
Li, Duoyun ;
Chen, Zhong ;
Cheng, Hang ;
Zheng, Jinxin ;
Pan, Weiguang ;
Deng, Minggui ;
Liu, Xiaojun ;
Lin, Zhiwei ;
Deng, Qiwen ;
Yu, Zhijian .
FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 365 (03)
[3]   Genomic insights of optrA-carrying linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium using hybrid assembly: first report from India [J].
Bakthavatchalam, Yamuna Devi ;
Vasudevan, Karthick ;
Babu, Priyanka ;
Neeravi, Ayyan Raj ;
Narasiman, Vignesh ;
Veeraraghavan, Balaji .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2021, 25 :331-336
[4]   Subinhibitory concentrations of linezolid reduce Staphylococcus aureus virulence factor expression [J].
Bernardo, K ;
Pakulat, N ;
Fleer, S ;
Schnaith, A ;
Utermöhlen, O ;
Krut, O ;
Müller, S ;
Krönke, M .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2004, 48 (02) :546-555
[5]   Linezolid decreases Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation by affecting the IcaA and IcaB proteins [J].
Bi, Hongxia ;
Deng, Rong ;
Liu, Yanbin .
ACTA MICROBIOLOGICA ET IMMUNOLOGICA HUNGARICA, 2022, 69 (02) :109-117
[6]   Whole genome analysis of linezolid resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae reveals resistance and compensatory mutations [J].
Billal, Dewan S. ;
Feng, Jie ;
Leprohon, Philippe ;
Legare, Danielle ;
Ouellette, Marc .
BMC GENOMICS, 2011, 12
[7]   The role of Staphylococcus aureus surface protein SasG in adherence and biofilm formation [J].
Corrigan, Rebecca M. ;
Rigby, David ;
Handley, Pauline ;
Foster, Timothy J. .
MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2007, 153 :2435-2446
[8]   Staphylococcus aureus: the current state of disease, pathophysiology and strategies for prevention [J].
Dayan, Gustavo H. ;
Mohamed, Naglaa ;
Scully, Ingrid L. ;
Cooper, David ;
Begier, Elizabeth ;
Eiden, Joseph ;
Jansen, Kathrin U. ;
Gurtman, Alejandra ;
Anderson, Annaliesa S. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2016, 15 (11) :1373-1392
[9]   Genome sequencing of linezolid-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae mutants reveals novel mechanisms of resistance [J].
Feng, Jie ;
Lupien, Andreanne ;
Gingras, Helene ;
Wasserscheid, Jessica ;
Dewar, Ken ;
Legare, Danielle ;
Ouellette, Marc .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2009, 19 (07) :1214-1223
[10]   Virulence factor expression by Gram-positive cocci exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of linezolid [J].
Gemmell, CG ;
Ford, CW .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 50 (05) :665-672