Consultations for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis before and after health insurance coverage of pre-exposure prophylaxis to a university-based emergency department in Germany

被引:0
作者
Boehm, Lennert [1 ]
Jensen, Bjoern-Erik Ole [2 ]
Schelzig, Hubert [3 ]
Luedde, Tom [2 ]
Bernhard, Michael [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Emergency Dept, Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Dept Gastroenterol Hepatol & Infectiol, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Heinrich Heine Univ, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Dept Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Dusseldorf, Germany
[4] Heinrich Heine Univ, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Emergency Dept, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Emergency department; HIV post-exposure prophylaxis; HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis; HIV prevention; MSM; MEN; SEX; IMPLEMENTATION; OPPORTUNITIES; PREVENTION; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1080/25787489.2023.2207977
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Potential risk contacts for HIV transmission may lead to presentations to the emergency department (ED) for counseling and initiation of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Objective: To examine the impact of German health insurance covering pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) following Sept 1(st) 2019 for certain risk groups on the frequency and reasons for PEP counseling in a university-based ED in Germany. Methods: In a before-after study design, all persons aged >= 18 years who presented for PEP counseling were analyzed retrospectively. We compared characteristics of presentations in the 18 months prior to PrEP coverage on Sept 1(st), 2019, with those in the following 18 months. Results: 154 ED presentations occurred in the first study period, and 155 ED presentations in the second period. Regarding the reasons for ED visits, no statistically significant difference was found [occupational risk contact (18.2 vs. 26.5%, p = 0.081), sexual risk contact (74.7 vs. 69.0%, p = 0.266), other non-occupational risk contact (7.1 vs. 4.5%, p = 0.329)]. For men who have sex with men (MSM), no statistically significant differences were found [38.9 (n = 60) vs. 35.5% (n = 55), p = 0.537]. All persons presenting to the HIV outpatient clinic after ED PEP initiation (n = 60 vs. n = 52) tested negative for HIV 3 months later. Conclusion: In this study, reasons to present for PEP counseling to a university ED showed no change following the implementation of PrEP coverage by health insurances. Therefore, PEP remains an important prevention for HIV transmission and presentations to the ED for PEP counseling may provide an opportunity to educate persons at risk of HIV infection about PrEP, thereby helping to prevent new HIV infections.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of a 2-step algorithm to identify emergency department patients for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis
    Haukoos, Jason S.
    White, Douglas A. E.
    Rowan, Sarah E.
    Lyle, Carolynn
    Gravitz, Stephanie
    Basham, Kellie
    Godoy, Ashley
    Kamis, Kevin
    Hopkins, Emily
    Anderson, Erik
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 51 : 6 - 12
  • [22] Comfort Discussing HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis With Patients Among Physicians in an Urban Emergency Department
    Tortelli, Brett A.
    Char, Douglas M.
    Crane, John S.
    Powderly, William G.
    Salter, Amber
    Chan, Philip A.
    Patel, Rupa R.
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2019, 80 (02) : E49 - E52
  • [23] HIV Prevention After Discontinuing Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: Conclusions From a Case Study
    Jonas, Kai J.
    Yaemim, Natthakhet
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
  • [24] Prescribing as affective clinical practice: Transformations in sexual health consultations through HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis
    Smith, Anthony K. J.
    Newman, Christy E.
    Haire, Bridget
    Holt, Martin
    SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2022, 44 (07) : 1182 - 1200
  • [25] Acute HIV at the Time of Initiation of Pre-exposure or Post-exposure Prophylaxis: Impact on Drug Resistance and Clinical Outcomes
    Johnson, Kelly A.
    Chen, Miao-Jung
    Kohn, Robert
    Sachdev, Darpun
    Bacon, Oliver
    Lee, Sulggi
    Cohen, Stephanie E.
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2021, 87 (02) : 818 - 825
  • [26] Rapid Uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis After Significant Price Reduction in Germany Highlights Importance of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Accessibility
    Mysior, Patryk
    Tenberken, Erik
    Stecher, Melanie
    Vehreschild, Joerg-Janne
    Schafberger, Armin
    Perea, Ines
    Brillen, Anna-Lena
    Bartmeyer, Barbara
    Esser, Stefan
    Bremer, Viviane
    Marcus, Ulrich
    Hoffmann, Daniel
    Streeck, Hendrik
    AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES, 2020, 36 (09) : 721 - 733
  • [27] Tenofovir-based HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis
    Paxton, Lynn A.
    FUTURE VIROLOGY, 2013, 8 (12) : 1207 - 1218
  • [28] Methods for county-level estimation of pre-exposure prophylaxis coverage and application to the US Ending the HIV Epidemic jurisdictions
    Sullivan, Patrick S.
    Mouhanna, Farah
    Mera, Robertino
    Pembleton, Elizabeth
    Castel, Amanda D.
    Jaggi, Chandni
    Jones, Jeb
    Kramer, Michael R.
    McGuinness, Pema
    McCallister, Scott
    Siegler, Aaron J.
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 44 : 16 - 30
  • [29] HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis provision by US health centers in 2021
    Chinbunchorn, Tanat
    Mayer, Kenneth H.
    Campbell, Juwan
    King, Dana
    Krakower, Douglas
    Marcus, Julia L.
    Grasso, Chris
    Keuroghlian, Alex S.
    AIDS, 2024, 38 (03) : 415 - 420
  • [30] Post-exposure prophylaxis after non-occupational exposure to HIV in Greece
    Raftopoulos, V.
    Nikolopoulos, G.
    Konte, V.
    Pylli, M.
    Tsiara, C.
    Makri, E.
    Paraskeva, D.
    INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2008, 55 (01) : 68 - 72