Consultations for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis before and after health insurance coverage of pre-exposure prophylaxis to a university-based emergency department in Germany

被引:0
作者
Boehm, Lennert [1 ]
Jensen, Bjoern-Erik Ole [2 ]
Schelzig, Hubert [3 ]
Luedde, Tom [2 ]
Bernhard, Michael [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Emergency Dept, Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Dept Gastroenterol Hepatol & Infectiol, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Heinrich Heine Univ, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Dept Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Dusseldorf, Germany
[4] Heinrich Heine Univ, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Emergency Dept, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Emergency department; HIV post-exposure prophylaxis; HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis; HIV prevention; MSM; MEN; SEX; IMPLEMENTATION; OPPORTUNITIES; PREVENTION; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1080/25787489.2023.2207977
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Potential risk contacts for HIV transmission may lead to presentations to the emergency department (ED) for counseling and initiation of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Objective: To examine the impact of German health insurance covering pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) following Sept 1(st) 2019 for certain risk groups on the frequency and reasons for PEP counseling in a university-based ED in Germany. Methods: In a before-after study design, all persons aged >= 18 years who presented for PEP counseling were analyzed retrospectively. We compared characteristics of presentations in the 18 months prior to PrEP coverage on Sept 1(st), 2019, with those in the following 18 months. Results: 154 ED presentations occurred in the first study period, and 155 ED presentations in the second period. Regarding the reasons for ED visits, no statistically significant difference was found [occupational risk contact (18.2 vs. 26.5%, p = 0.081), sexual risk contact (74.7 vs. 69.0%, p = 0.266), other non-occupational risk contact (7.1 vs. 4.5%, p = 0.329)]. For men who have sex with men (MSM), no statistically significant differences were found [38.9 (n = 60) vs. 35.5% (n = 55), p = 0.537]. All persons presenting to the HIV outpatient clinic after ED PEP initiation (n = 60 vs. n = 52) tested negative for HIV 3 months later. Conclusion: In this study, reasons to present for PEP counseling to a university ED showed no change following the implementation of PrEP coverage by health insurances. Therefore, PEP remains an important prevention for HIV transmission and presentations to the ED for PEP counseling may provide an opportunity to educate persons at risk of HIV infection about PrEP, thereby helping to prevent new HIV infections.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Post-exposure prophylaxis in the era of pre-exposure prophylaxis
    Atim, M.
    Girometti, N.
    Hyndman, I
    McOwan, A.
    Whitlock, G.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (10) : 668 - 670
  • [2] Routine Data Analysis of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use and Rates of Sexually Transmitted Infections Since Coverage of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis by the Statutory Health Insurance in Germany
    Valbert, Frederik
    Schmidt, Daniel
    Kollan, Christian
    Droege, Patrik
    Klein, Melanie
    Schneider, Udo
    Friebe, Martin
    Wasem, Juergen
    Neumann, Anja
    ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2024, 53 (09) : 3663 - 3672
  • [3] Preparing for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Lessons Learned from Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
    Cohen, Stephanie E.
    Liu, Albert Y.
    Bernstein, Kyle T.
    Philip, Susan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (01) : S80 - S85
  • [4] Changes in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis prescriptions before and after the introduction of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis at a sexual health clinic in Melbourne, Australia, 2011-2021
    Samra, Ranjit S.
    Fairley, Christopher K.
    Ong, Jason J.
    Aung, Ei T.
    Chow, Eric PF.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 48 (04)
  • [5] HIV Risk and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Eligibility Among Emergency Department Patients
    Haukoos, Jason S.
    White, Douglas A. E.
    Rowan, Sarah E.
    Lyle, Carolynn
    Gravitz, Stephanie
    Basham, Kellie
    Godoy, Ashley
    Kamis, Kevin
    Hopkins, Emily
    Anderson, Erik
    AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS, 2021, 35 (06) : 211 - 219
  • [6] Public health significance of human immunodeficiency virus pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis
    Xu, Jun-Jie
    Shang, Hong
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 133 (23) : 2773 - 2774
  • [7] Sexually transmitted diseases in people living with HIV after implementation of cost coverage of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis by statutory health insurance in Germany
    Schuettfort, Gundolf
    Groh, Ana
    Kann, Gerrit
    Haberl, Annette
    Herrmann, Eva
    Wetzstein, Nils
    Vehreschild, Maria Johanna Gobertina Tetuanui
    Stephan, Christoph
    HIV MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (02) : 163 - 169
  • [8] HIV risk and awareness and interest in pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis among sheltered women in Miami
    Doblecki-Lewis, Susanne
    Lester, Larissa
    Schwartz, Bryanna
    Collins, Constance
    Johnson, Rai
    Kobetz, Erin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2016, 27 (10) : 873 - 881
  • [9] Post-exposure prophylaxis in the era of pre-exposure prophylaxis: a study of post-exposure prophylaxis use in South-East Queensland since the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing of pre-exposure prophylaxis
    Biggs, Karen
    O'Sullivan, Maree
    Palmer, Cheryn
    McLellan, Jacqualine
    Marple-Clark, Fiona
    Spinks, Adam
    Langton-Lockton, Julian
    Thng, Caroline
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2020, 31 (05) : 426 - 431
  • [10] Exploring Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) Knowledge in Incarcerated Men
    Valera, Pamela
    Ali, Zaire S.
    Cunningham, Diamond
    McLaughlin, Christopher
    Acevedo, Sebastian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2022, 16 (04)