The Relationship Between Personality Traits and the Processing of Emotion Words: Evidence from Eye-Movements in Sentence Reading

被引:3
作者
Johnson, Rebecca L. [1 ]
Wootten, Megan [1 ]
Spear, Abigail I. [1 ]
Smolensky, Ashley [1 ]
机构
[1] Skidmore Coll, Dept Psychol, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 USA
关键词
Reading; Emotion words; Eye-movements; Personality traits; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERCEPTUAL SPAN; AUTOMATIC ACTIVATION; VISUAL-ATTENTION; FREE-RECALL; PREDICTABILITY; INFORMATION; FREQUENCY; MODEL; INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10936-023-09959-y
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Previous research shows that processing times on emotion words (both negative and positive) are faster than on non-emotional neutral words. In the current study, we explored how personality traits (the Big Five and the trait emotional intelligence factors) may further influence the processing of emotion versus non-emotion words by conducting two experiments where participants silently read sentences while their eye movements were recorded. The results replicated the facilitative emotion effect and showed that those with higher agreeableness scores had stronger emotion effects on positive words and those with higher extraversion scores, higher openness scores, higher agreeableness scores, lower sociability scores, and higher emotionality scores had stronger emotion effects on negative words. Furthermore, some personality traits also led to different ways that readers approach text, for example, through more risky reading strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1523
页数:27
相关论文
共 74 条
[21]   Individual differences in emotion processing [J].
Hamann, S ;
Canli, T .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (02) :233-238
[22]   Affective processing within 1/10th of a second: High arousal is necessary for early facilitative processing of negative but not positive words [J].
Hofmann, Markus J. ;
Kuchinke, Lars ;
Tamm, Sascha ;
Vo, Melissa L. -H. ;
Jacobs, Arthur M. .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 9 (04) :389-397
[23]   Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models [J].
Jaeger, T. Florian .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :434-446
[24]  
John OP., 1991, The big five inventoryversions 4a and 54
[25]   Predictability and Parafoveal Preview Effects in the Developing Reader: Evidence From Eye Movements [J].
Johnson, Rebecca L. ;
Oehrlein, Elizabeth C. ;
Roche, William L. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2018, 44 (07) :973-991
[26]   A CAPACITY THEORY OF COMPREHENSION - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY [J].
JUST, MA ;
CARPENTER, PA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1992, 99 (01) :122-149
[27]   Laterality, word valence, and visual attention: a comparison of depressed and non-depressed individuals [J].
Kakolewski, KE ;
Crowson, JJ ;
Sewell, KW ;
Cromwell, RL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (03) :283-292
[28]   Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study [J].
Kanske, Philipp ;
Kotz, Sonja A. .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 1148 :138-148
[29]   Buzzwords - Early cortical responses to emotional words during reading [J].
Kissler, Johanna ;
Herbert, Cornelia ;
Peyk, Peter ;
Junghofer, Markus .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (06) :475-480
[30]   Emotion, Etmnooi, or Emitoon? - Faster lexical access to emotional than to neutral words during reading [J].
Kissler, Johanna ;
Herbert, Cornelia .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 92 (03) :464-479