Breaking the Budgetary Taboo: German Preference Formation in the EU's Response to the Covid-19 Crisis

被引:19
作者
Crespy, Amandine [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schramm, Lucas [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles ULB, Polit Sci & European Studies, Cevipol, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles ULB, Polit Sci & European Studies, Inst Etud Europeennes IEE, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Coll Europe, Brugge, Belgium
[4] European Univ Inst, Dept Social & Polit Sci, Florence, Italy
关键词
INTERGOVERNMENTALISM; GOVERNANCE; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/09644008.2021.2020253
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In the face of the coronavirus pandemic, the German government embraced a major shift towards a grants-based EU recovery fund relying on common European debt. How can we explain this impetus, especially in view of the reticent German fiscal stance in previous years and in the early stages of the pandemic? To elucidate this question, this paper provides a qualitative inquiry into German preference formation during the spring of 2020. Theoretically, it reconciles liberal intergovernmentalist and discursive accounts of preference formation in the context of EU politics stressing the intertwined nature and simultaneousness of preference formation in the national and European arenas. We hypothesise that, along with material self-interests, the construction and framing of the pandemic as a certain type of crisis was key. Examining the stances taken by the federal government, commercial groups and key EU actors such as France and the European Commission, our findings point to a rapid preference realignment in German political and economic circles. Overall, the analysis suggests that especially in times of crisis, assumed national preferences are subject to reconfiguration thus allowing for contingent political responses.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 67
页数:22
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, press release
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, press release
[3]  
Auswartiges Amt, 2020, RESPONSE CORONA CRIS
[4]  
BDA, 2020, EUR INF 02
[5]  
Beach D., 2019, Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines
[6]  
Beland Daniel., 2010, IDEAS POLITICS SOCIA
[7]   Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment [J].
Benford, RD ;
Snow, DA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 26 :611-639
[8]  
Beno├a┬t Cyril., COMP EUR POLIT
[9]   Political (non-)reform in the euro crisis and the refugee crisis: a liberal intergovernmentalist explanation [J].
Biermann, Felix ;
Guerin, Nina ;
Jagdhuber, Stefan ;
Rittberger, Berthold ;
Weiss, Moritz .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2019, 26 (02) :246-266
[10]  
Boin A., 2005, POLITICS CRISIS MANA