Enhancing formula student car performance: Nose shape optimization via adjoint method

被引:8
作者
Hoque, Md Araful [1 ]
Rahman, Md Saifur [1 ]
Rimi, Khairun Nasrin [1 ]
Alif, Abdur Rahman [1 ]
Haque, Mohammad Rejaul [1 ]
机构
[1] Ahsanullah Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech & Prod Engn, Dhaka 1208, Bangladesh
关键词
Gradient-based optimization; Adjoint CFD; FSAE; Automotive industry; Aerodynamics; FLOW; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101636
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
For a formula student vehicle, the nose is the first point of flow contact and decides the flow direction to help other aero components work efficiently. Therefore, an optimized nose shape is crucial for the optimum running condition of the vehicle. In recent years, Gradient-based optimization in the automotive industry has emerged with an adjoint approach. The adjoint solver is used to modify the geometry such as the nose of a car to the best optimal shape with respect to other design variables. Hence, the present study encompasses an examination conducted under six distinct Reynolds number conditions, specifically, 8.15 x 105, 9.05 x 105, 9.96 x 105, 10.87 x 105, 11.77 x 105, and 12.68 x 105. The simulation setup is validated using the Ahmed Body's 30 degrees slant angle. The setup uses the k-omega SST turbulence model to capture the airflow phenomenon over the racing car. The simulation setup shows only a 0.07 % variation from the existing experimental findings. The results are represented in terms of different 2D plots, contours and streamline plots. The optimized nose has 27 % less drag and consumes 27.09 % less fuel than the base model at a Reynolds number of 10.8 x 105. To the automotive industry and race community, this optimization technique will be expected to enhance the vehicle's overall performance.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Optimising the computational domain size in CFD simulations of tall buildings [J].
Abu-Zidan, Yousef ;
Mendis, Priyan ;
Gunawardena, Tharaka .
HELIYON, 2021, 7 (04)
[2]  
Ahmed S. R., 1984, SAE Technical Papers, P473, DOI DOI 10.4271/840300
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Fields J. Huddersf. student Res., V4, DOI [10.5920/FIELDS.2018.02, DOI 10.5920/FIELDS.2018.02]
[4]  
Blacha T, 2016, SAE Tech. Pap, DOI [10.4271/2016-01-1615, DOI 10.4271/2016-01-1615]
[5]   2D and 3D aerodynamic shape optimisation using the adjoint approach [J].
Brezillon, J ;
Gauger, NR .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 8 (08) :715-727
[6]   Methodology for the Design of an Aerodynamic Package for a Formula SAE Vehicle [J].
Craig, Christopher ;
Passmore, Martin A. .
SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PASSENGER CARS-MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 2014, 7 (02) :575-585
[7]  
Doddegowda P., 2006, SAE Tech. Pap., V2006, DOI [10.4271/2006-01-0807, DOI 10.4271/2006-01-0807]
[8]  
Ebaid M.S.Y., 2016, Int. J. Mech. Eng. Educ., V44, P56, DOI [10.1177/0306419015624984, DOI 10.1177/0306419015624984]
[9]   Discrete adjoint aerodynamic shape optimization using symbolic analysis with OpenFEMflow [J].
Elham, Ali ;
van Tooren, Michel J. L. .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2021, 63 (05) :2531-2551
[10]   Computational Analyses of the Effects of Wind Tunnel Ground Simulation and Blockage Ratio on the Aerodynamic Prediction of Flow over a Passenger Vehicle [J].
Fu, Chen ;
Uddin, Mesbah ;
Zhang, Chunhui .
VEHICLES, 2020, 2 (02) :318-341