Socioeconomic inequalities in metabolic syndrome and its components in a sample of Iranian Kurdish adults

被引:1
作者
Mohammadzadeh, Pardis [1 ,2 ]
Moradpour, Farhad [3 ]
Nouri, Bijan [4 ]
Mostafavi, Farideh [5 ]
Najafi, Farid [6 ]
Moradi, Ghobad [1 ,3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Kurdistan Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Sanandaj, Iran
[2] Kurdistan Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Sanandaj, Iran
[3] Kurdistan Univ Med Sci, Social Determinants Hlth Res Ctr, Sanandaj, Iran
[4] Kurdistan Univ Med Sci, Res Inst Hlth Dev, Hlth Metr & Evaluat Res Ctr, Sanandaj, Iran
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth & Safety, Dept Epidemiol, Tehran, Iran
[6] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Kermanshah, Iran
[7] Kurdistan Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Sanandaj 6617913446, Iran
来源
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH | 2023年 / 45卷
关键词
Metabolic syndrome; Social class; Health inequalities; Concentration index; Iran; RISK-FACTORS; CONCENTRATION INDEX; PREVALENCE; DECOMPOSITION; HYPERTENSION; DISEASE; GENDER; WEALTH;
D O I
10.4178/epih.e2023083
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: The worldwide incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) has increased in recent decades. In this study, we investigated the socioeconomic inequalities associated with MetS and its components in a sample of the Iranian Kurdish population. METHODS: We used data from 3,996 participants, aged 35 years to 70 years, from the baseline phase of the Dehgolan Prospective Cohort Study (February 2018 to March 2019). The concentration index and concentration curve were used to measure in-equality and the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method was used to examine the contribution of various determinants to the observed socioeconomic inequality in MetS and its components.RESULTS: The prevalence of MetS was 34.44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.97 to 35.93). The prevalence of MetS was 26.18% for those in the highest socioeconomic status (SES), compared with 40.51% for participants in the lowest SES. There was a significant negative concentration index for MetS (C =-0.13; 95% CI,-0.16 to-0.09), indicating a concentration of MetS among participants with a lower SES. The most prevalent component was abdominal obesity (59.14%) with a significant negative concentration index (C =-0.21; 95% CI,-0.25 to-0.18). According to decomposition analysis, age, gender, and education were the highest contributing factors to inequality in MetS and its components.CONCLUSIONS: This study showed socioeconomic inequality in MetS. People with a low SES were more likely to have MetS. Therefore, policymakers and health managers need to develop appropriate strategies to reduce these inequalities in MetS across age groups, genders, and education levels, especially among women and the elderly.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Socioeconomic Inequalities in Metabolic Syndrome by Age and Gender in a Spanish Working Population
    Abbate, Manuela
    Pericas, Jordi
    Yanez, Aina M.
    Lopez-Gonzalez, Angel A.
    De Pedro-Gomez, Joan
    Aguilo, Antoni
    Morales-Asencio, Jose M.
    Bennasar-Veny, Miquel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (19)
  • [2] Allen L, 2017, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V5, pE277, DOI [10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30058-X, 10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30058-x]
  • [3] Why behavioural health promotion endures despite its failure to reduce health inequities
    Baum, Fran
    Fisher, Matthew
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2014, 36 (02) : 213 - 225
  • [4] NCD Countdown 2030: pathways to achieving Sustainable Development Goal target 3.4
    Bennett, James E.
    Kontis, Vasilis
    Mathers, Colin D.
    Guillot, Michel
    Rehm, Jurgen
    Chalkidou, Kalipso
    Kengne, Andre Pascal
    Carrillo-Larco, Rodrigo M.
    Bawah, Ayaga A.
    Dain, Katie
    Varghese, Cherian
    Riley, Leanne M.
    Bonita, Ruth
    Kruk, Margaret E.
    Beaglehole, Robert
    Ezzati, Majid
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 396 (10255) : 918 - 934
  • [5] Socio-economics status and metabolic syndrome: A meta-analysis
    Blanquet, M.
    Legrand, A.
    Pelissier, A.
    Mourgues, C.
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLIC SYNDROME-CLINICAL RESEARCH & REVIEWS, 2019, 13 (03) : 1805 - 1812
  • [6] Social inequality in coronary risk: central obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Evidence from the Whitehall II study
    Brunner, EJ
    Marmot, MG
    Nanchahal, K
    Shipley, MJ
    Stansfeld, SA
    Juneja, M
    Alberti, KGMM
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 1997, 40 (11) : 1341 - 1349
  • [7] Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
    Cleeman, JI
    Grundy, SM
    Becker, D
    Clark, LT
    Cooper, RS
    Denke, MA
    Howard, WJ
    Hunninghake, DB
    Illingworth, DR
    Luepker, RV
    McBride, P
    McKenney, JM
    Pasternak, RC
    Stone, NJ
    Van Horn, L
    Brewer, HB
    Ernst, ND
    Gordon, D
    Levy, D
    Rifkind, B
    Rossouw, JE
    Savage, P
    Haffner, SM
    Orloff, DG
    Proschan, MA
    Schwartz, JS
    Sempos, CT
    Shero, ST
    Murray, EZ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (19): : 2486 - 2497
  • [8] Theoretical Approaches to Research on the Social Determinants of Obesity
    Cockerham, William C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 63 (01) : S8 - S17
  • [9] Socioeconomic inequalities in metabolic syndrome in the French West Indies
    Colombet, Zoe
    Perignon, Marlene
    Salanave, Benoit
    Landais, Edwige
    Martin-Prevel, Yves
    Alles, Benjamin
    Drogue, Sophie
    Amiot, Marie Josephe
    Mejean, Caroline
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [10] Early-life chemical exposures and risk of metabolic syndrome
    De Long, Nicole E.
    Holloway, Alison C.
    [J]. DIABETES METABOLIC SYNDROME AND OBESITY-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2017, 10 : 101 - 109