Symbolic or substantive CSR: effect of green mergers and acquisitions premium on firm value in China

Purpose As the cost of completing a transaction, the green merger and acquisition (M & A) premium paid on mergers can influence whether the acquisition creates value or not. However, studies linking M & A premiums to firm value have had mixed results, even fewer studies have examined the effect of green M & A premiums on bidders' firm value. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether and how green M & A premiums affect firm value in the context of China's heavy polluters.Design/methodology/approach Using 323 deals between 2008 and 2019 among China's heavy polluters, this paper estimates with correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis.Findings Green M & A premiums are negatively associated with firm value. The results are more significant when firms adopt symbolic rather than substantive corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies. Robustness and endogeneity tests corroborate the findings. The negative relation is stronger when acquiring firms have low governmental subsidy and environmental regulation, when firms have overconfident management, when firms are state-owned and when green M & A occurs locally or among provinces in the same region. This study also analyzes agency cost as an intermediary in the relationship between green M & A premium and firm value, which lends support to the agency-view hypothesis.Originality/value This study provides systemic evidence that green M & A premiums damage firm value through agency cost channel and the choice of CSR strategies from the perspective of acquirers. These findings enrich the literature on both the economic consequences of green M & A premiums and the determinants of firm value and provide a plausible explanation for mixed findings on the relationship between green M & A premiums and firm value.