Assessing gaps in motherhood after cancer: development and psychometric testing of the Survivorship Oncofertility Barriers Scale

被引:0
作者
Hoffman, Aubri [1 ]
Denham, Chloe Josephine [2 ]
Fu, Shuangshuang [3 ]
Mendoza, Tito [4 ]
Nitecki, Roni [5 ]
Jorgensen, Kirsten A. [6 ]
Garcia, Jose [1 ]
Lamiman, Kelly [7 ]
Woodard, Terri L. [1 ]
Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas McGovern Med Sch, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Symptom Res, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Gynecol Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX USA
[7] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Galveston, TX USA
关键词
Neoplasms; FERTILITY PRESERVATION; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; DISPARITIES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2023-004302
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective With a growing population of young cancer survivors, there is an increasing need to address the gaps in evidence regarding cancer survivors' obstetric outcomes, fertility care access, and experiences. As part of a large research program, this study engaged survivors and experts in co-developing and testing the validity, reliability, acceptability, and feasibility of a scale to assess survivor-reported barriers to motherhood after cancer. Methods Scale items were developed based on literature and expert review of 226 reproductive health items, and six experience and focus groups with 26 survivors of breast and gynecological cancers. We then invited 128 survivors to complete the scale twice, 48 hours apart, and assessed the scale's psychometric properties using exploratory factor analyses including reliability, known-group validity, and convergent validity. Results Item development identified three primary themes: multifaceted barriers for cancer survivors; challenging decisions about whether and how to pursue motherhood; and a timely need for evidence about obstetric outcomes. Retained items were developed into a 24-item prototype scale with four subscales. Prototype testing showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.71) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.70). Known-group validity was supported; the scale discriminated between groups by age (x=70.0 for patients >= 35 years old vs 54.5 for patients <35 years old, p=0.02) and years since diagnosis (x=71.5 for >= 6 years vs 54.3 for<6 years, p=0.01). The financial subscale was correlated with the Economic StraiN and Resilience in Cancer measure of financial toxicity (rho=0.39, p<0.001). The scale was acceptable and feasibly delivered online. The final 22-item scale is organized in four subscales: personal, medical, relational, and financial barriers to motherhood. Conclusion The Survivorship Oncofertility Barriers Scale demonstrated validity, reliability, and was acceptable and feasible when delivered online. Implementing the scale can gather the data needed to inform shared decision making and to address disparities in fertility care for survivors.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 785
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   The impact of cancer on subsequent chance of pregnancy: a population-based analysis [J].
Anderson, Richard A. ;
Brewster, David H. ;
Wood, Rachael ;
Nowell, Sian ;
Fischbacher, Colin ;
Kelsey, Tom W. ;
Wallace, W. Hamish B. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 (07) :1281-1290
[2]   Fertility results and pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment of cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Bentivegna, Enrica ;
Maulard, Amandine ;
Pautier, Patricia ;
Chargari, Cyrus ;
Gouy, Sebastien ;
Morice, Philippe .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (05) :1195-+
[3]   The Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties [J].
Boivin, Jacky ;
Takefman, Janet ;
Braverman, Andrea .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (02) :409-U479
[4]   Medical and Psychosocial Aspects of Fertility After Cancer [J].
Duffy, Christine ;
Allen, Susan .
CANCER JOURNAL, 2009, 15 (01) :27-33
[5]   Predictors of pregnancy and discontinuation of infertility services among women who received medical help to become pregnant, National Survey of Family Growth, 2002 [J].
Farr, Sherry L. ;
Anderson, John E. ;
Jamieson, Denise J. ;
Warner, Lee ;
Macaluso, Maurizio .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (04) :988-997
[6]  
Gardino SL, 2010, CANCER TREAT RES, V156, P153, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6518-9_11
[7]   Decisional Conflict Scale Use over 20 Years: The Anniversary Review [J].
Garvelink, Mirjam M. ;
Boland, Laura ;
Klein, Krystal ;
Don Vu Nguyen ;
Menear, Matthew ;
Bekker, Hilary L. ;
Eden, Karen B. ;
LeBlanc, Annie ;
O'Connor, Annette M. ;
Stacey, Dawn ;
Legare, France .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 39 (04) :301-314
[8]   Revisiting the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer (RCAC) scale [J].
Gorman, Jessica R. ;
Pan-Weisz, Tonya M. ;
Drizin, Julia H. ;
Su, H. Irene ;
Malcarne, Vanessa L. .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 (07) :1544-1550
[9]   Fertility of Female Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study [J].
Green, Daniel M. ;
Kawashima, Toana ;
Stovall, Marilyn ;
Leisenring, Wendy ;
Sklar, Charles A. ;
Mertens, Ann C. ;
Donaldson, Sarah S. ;
Byrne, Julianne ;
Robison, Leslie L. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (16) :2677-2685
[10]   Outcomes That Matter Most to Young Adults Diagnosed with Cancer: A Qualitative Study [J].
Guzik, Paul ;
McKinney, Jennifer A. ;
Ulack, Christopher ;
Suarez, Joel ;
Davis, Victoria ;
Teisberg, Elizabeth ;
Wallace, Scott ;
Eckhardt, S. Gail ;
Capasso, Anna .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10 (05) :534-539