Evaluating Glass Ionomer Cement Longevity in the Primary and Permanent Teeth-An Umbrella Review

被引:7
作者
Panetta, Alessandro [1 ]
Lopes, Pedro [1 ,2 ]
Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes [3 ]
Rio, Rute [1 ,2 ]
Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira [2 ,4 ]
Mello-Moura, Anna Carolina Volpi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catol Portuguesa, Fac Dent Med, P-3504505 Viseu, Portugal
[2] Univ Catol Portuguesa, Fac Dent Med, Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Hlth, P-3504505 Viseu, Portugal
[3] Univ Cruzeiro, Fac Odontol, Dept Odontopediatria, BR-04795902 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] A T Still Univ, Missouri Sch Dent & Oral Hlth, St Louis, MO 63104 USA
关键词
glass ionomer cement; primary teeth; permanent teeth; restorative material; umbrella review; ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; PRIMARY MOLARS; HYDROXYAPATITE; COMPOSITE; SURVIVAL; METAANALYSIS; STRENGTH; HARDNESS; POWDER;
D O I
10.3390/jfb15020048
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The aim of this umbrella review was to evaluate the longevity of glass ionomer cement (GIC) as a restorative material for primary and permanent teeth. Research in the literature was conducted in three databases (MedLine/PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus). The inclusion criteria were: (1) to be a systematic review of clinical trials that (2) evaluated the clinical longevity of GICs as a restorative material in primary and/or permanent teeth; the exclusion criteria were: (1) not being a systematic review of clinical trials; (2) not evaluating longevity/clinical performance of GICs as a restorative material; and (3) studies of dental restorative materials in teeth with enamel alterations, root caries, and non-carious cervical lesions. Twenty-four eligible articles were identified, and 13 were included. The follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 6 years. Different types of GICs were evaluated in the included studies: resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), compomers, and low- and high-viscosity glass ionomer cement. Some studies compared amalgam and composite resins to GICs regarding longevity/clinical performance. Analyzing the AMSTAR-2 results, none of the articles had positive criteria in all the evaluated requisites, and none of the articles had an a priori design. The criteria considered for the analysis of the risk of bias of the included studies were evaluated through the ROBIS tool, and the results of this analysis showed that seven studies had a low risk of bias; three studies had positive results in all criteria except for one criterion of unclear risk; and two studies showed a high risk of bias. GRADE tool was used to determine the quality of evidence; for the degree of recommendations, all studies were classified as Class II, meaning there was still conflicting evidence on the clinical performance/longevity of GICs and their recommendations compared to other materials. The level of evidence was classified as Level B, meaning that the data were obtained from less robust meta-analyses and single randomized clinical trials. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first umbrella review approaching GIC in permanent teeth. GICs are a good choice in both dentitions, but primary dentition presents more evidence, especially regarding the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique. Within the limitation of this study, it is still questionable if GIC is a good restorative material in the medium/long term for permanent and primary dentition. Many of the included studies presented a high risk of bias and low quality. The techniques, type of GIC, type of cavity, and operator experience highly influence clinical performance. Thus, clinical decision-making should be based on the dental practitioner's ability, each case analysis, and the patient's wishes. More evidence is needed to determine which is the best material for definitive restorations in permanent and primary dentition.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Lasers in caries detection in primary and permanent teeth: a literature review [J].
Takila M. ;
Smeo K. ;
Gutknecht N. .
Lasers in Dental Science, 2019, 3 (1) :21-29
[32]   A prospective and randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of ART restorations with high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement versus conventional restorations with resin composite in Class II cavities of permanent teeth: two-year follow-up [J].
Menezes-Silva, Rafael ;
Maito Velasco, Sofia R. ;
Bresciani, Eduardo ;
Bastos, Roosevelt da Silva ;
de Lima Navarro, Maria Fidela .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2021, 29 :1-10
[33]   The effectiveness of glass ionomer cement as a fiber post cementation system in endodontically treated teeth [J].
Lorenzetti, Camila C. ;
Bortolatto, Janaina F. ;
Ramos, Anna T. P. R. ;
Shinohara, Andre L. ;
Saad, Jose R. C. ;
Kuga, Milton C. .
MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2019, 82 (07) :1191-1197
[34]   Incorporating nanosilver with glass ionomer cement-A literature review [J].
Guo, Tiantian ;
Wang, Dai ;
Gao, Sherry Shiqian .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 149
[35]   Low-cost glass ionomer cement as ART sealant in permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial [J].
Hesse, Daniela ;
Bonifacio, Clarissa Calil ;
Brandao Guglielmi, Camila de Almeida ;
da Franca, Carolina ;
Mendes, Fausto Medeiros ;
Raggio, Daniela Procida .
BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2015, 29 (01) :1-9
[36]   Comparative evaluation of a bioactive restorative material with resin modified glass ionomer for calcium-ion release and shear bond strength to dentin of primary teeth-an in vitro study [J].
Bhatia, Kunal ;
Nayak, Rashmi ;
Ginjupalli, Kishore .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 46 (06) :25-32
[37]   Machine assisted instrumentation for preparation of primary teeth: an umbrella review [J].
Teles, Ana Moura ;
Lopes, Pedro C. ;
Veiga, Nelio ;
D'Andrea, Mariana ;
Correia, Patricia ;
Mello-Moura, Anna C. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2025, 49 (03) :1-8
[38]   Bond strengths of glass ionomer restoratives to primary vs permanent dentin [J].
Thean, HPY ;
Mok, BYY ;
Chew, CL .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 2000, 67 (02) :112-+
[39]   Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars [J].
Folkesson, UH ;
Andersson-Wenckert, IE ;
van Dijken, JWV .
SWEDISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1999, 23 (01) :1-9
[40]   Vital pulp therapy in carious pulp–exposed permanent teeth: an umbrella review [J].
Dephne Jack Xin Leong ;
Adrian Ujin Yap .
Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 :6743-6756