Stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis on population benefits

被引:0
作者
Chen, Ermo [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Math Sci, 5 Yiheyuan Rd, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
Stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis; Population benefits; Risk allocation; Return on risk; EFFECTIVENESS ACCEPTABILITY CURVES;
D O I
10.1186/s12962-023-00488-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Dealing with randomness is a crucial aspect that cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) tools need to address, but existing stochastic CEA tools have rarely examined risk and return from the perspective of population benefits, concerning the benefits of a group of individuals but not just a typical one. This paper proposes a stochastic CEA tool that supports medical decision-making from the perspective of population benefits of risk and return, the risk-adjusted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The tool has a traditional form of ICER but uses the cost under a risk-adjusted expectation. Theoretically, we prove that the tool can provide medical decisions trimming that promote the risk-return level on population benefits within any intervention structure and can also serve as a criterion for the optimal intervention structure. Numerical simulations within a framework of mean-variance support the conclusions in this paper. The typical assumption in classical CEA that all get the new intervention versus standard of care may not be the best to achieve the best outcome to population, a mixed structure can be betterThe intervention structure should be modified using a criterion considering slight changes on the structure of the treatment mix.Use a risk adjustment concerning cost and outcome uncertainties in taking expectation in ICER calculation gives the optimal treatment mix for population benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curves Revisited
    Al, Maiwenn J.
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (02) : 93 - 100
  • [2] Coherent measures of risk
    Artzner, P
    Delbaen, F
    Eber, JM
    Heath, D
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 1999, 9 (03) : 203 - 228
  • [3] Optimal cost-effectiveness decisions: The role of the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC), the cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier (CEAF), and the expected value of perfection information (EVPI)
    Barton, Garry R.
    Briggs, Andrew H.
    Fenwick, Elisabeth A. L.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (05) : 886 - 897
  • [4] Risk capital allocation for RORAC optimization
    Buch, Arne
    Dorfleitner, Gregor
    Wimmer, Maximilian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2011, 35 (11) : 3001 - 3009
  • [5] Denault M., 2001, Journal of Risk, V4, P1
  • [6] Cost-Effectiveness Risk-Aversion Curves: Comparison of Risk-Adjusted Performance Measures and Expected-Utility Approaches
    Elbasha, Elamin H.
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2022, 40 (05) : 497 - 507
  • [7] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ACCEPTABILITY CURVES - CAVEATS QUANTIFIED
    Jakubczyk, Michal
    Kaminski, Bogumil
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2010, 19 (08) : 955 - 963
  • [8] Perspective and Costing in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, 1974-2018
    Kim, David D.
    Silver, Madison C.
    Kunst, Natalia
    Cohen, Joshua T.
    Ollendorf, Daniel A.
    Neumann, Peter J.
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2020, 38 (10) : 1135 - 1145
  • [9] Incorporating Affordability Concerns Within Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health Technology Assessment
    Lomas, James R. S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (08) : 898 - 905
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants compared to low-molecular-weight-heparins for treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism in Spain
    Munoz, Andres
    Gallardo, Enrique
    Agnelli, Giancarlo
    Crespo, Carlos
    Forghani, Monica
    Arumi, Daniel
    Fernandez de Cabo, Susana
    Soto, Javier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 25 (01) : 840 - 847