EQCCT: A Production-Ready Earthquake Detection and Phase-Picking Method Using the Compact Convolutional Transformer

被引:37
作者
Saad, Omar M. [1 ]
Chen, Yunfeng [2 ]
Siervo, Daniel [3 ]
Zhang, Fangxue [2 ]
Savvaidis, Alexandros [3 ]
Huang, Guo-chin Dino [3 ]
Igonin, Nadine [3 ]
Fomel, Sergey [3 ]
Chen, Yangkang [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Inst Astron & Geophys NRIAG, Seismol Dept, Helwan 11421, Egypt
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Earth Sci, Key Lab Geosci Big Data & Deep Resource Zhejiang P, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Bur Econ Geol, Austin, TX 78713 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2023年 / 61卷
关键词
Transformers; Earthquakes; Feature extraction; Training; Task analysis; Kernel; Deep learning; Deep learning (DL); earthquake; earthquake detection; microseismic; phase picking; transformer;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2023.3319440
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We propose to implement a compact convolutional transformer (CCT) for picking the earthquake phase arrivals (EQCCT). The proposed method consists of two branches, with each of them responsible for picking the arrival times of the P- or S-wave phases. We use the STEAD dataset to train and validate the proposed EQCCT algorithm. We split the STEAD dataset into 85% for training, 5% for validation, and 10% for testing. To facilitate the training process, we implement several data augmentation strategies to the training set by adding Gaussian noise, randomly shifting the waveforms, adding a second earthquake to the input window, and dropping one or two channels from the seismogram in the STEAD dataset. As a result, the EQCCT model outperforms both EQTransformer and PhaseNet, the two most popular deep-learning-based phase-picking methods. Considering the true positive criterion as the picked phases arriving within 0.5 s of the reference times, the EQCCT achieves the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) compared to the EQTransformer and PhaseNet methods for the STEAD, Japanese, Instance and Texas datasets. Our EQCCT network also demonstrates superior performance in other metrics such as precision, recall, and F1 score. We apply the pre-trained model to three independent datasets (not included in the training set), i.e., the Japanese, Texas, and Instance datasets, and achieve higher picking accuracy than the EQTransformer and the PhaseNet in terms of various statistical metrics, demonstrating a stronger robustness and generalization ability of the EQCCT. The real-time application of EQCCT in the Texas Seismological Network (TexNet) further demonstrates its production-ready performance in terms of detection and phase-picking accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ALLEN RV, 1978, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V68, P1521
[2]  
Dosovitskiy A, 2021, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2010.11929
[3]   EdgePhase: A Deep Learning Model for Multi-Station Seismic Phase Picking [J].
Feng, Tian ;
Mohanna, Saeed ;
Meng, Lingsen .
GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2022, 23 (11)
[4]   Real-time discrimination of earthquake foreshocks and aftershocks [J].
Gulia, Laura ;
Wiemer, Stefan .
NATURE, 2019, 574 (7777) :193-+
[5]  
Hassani A, 2022, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2104.05704, 10.48550/arXiv.2104.05704]
[6]  
Hendrycks D, 2020, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1606.08415
[7]   Spatio-temporal foreshock evolution of the 2019 M 6.4 and M 7.1 Ridgecrest, California earthquakes [J].
Huang, Hui ;
Meng, Lingsen ;
Burgmann, Roland ;
Wang, Wei ;
Wang, Kang .
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2020, 551
[8]   Large-Scale Fracture Systems Are Permeable Pathways for Fault Activation During Hydraulic Fracturing [J].
Igonin, Nadine ;
Verdon, James P. ;
Kendall, J. -Michael ;
Eaton, David W. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2021, 126 (03)
[9]  
Ioffe S, 2015, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1502.03167
[10]  
King DB, 2015, ACS SYM SER, V1214, P1, DOI 10.1021/bk-2015-1214.ch001