Planning policies for the driverless city using backcasting and the participatory Q-Methodology

被引:4
作者
Nogues, Soledad [1 ]
Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Esther [1 ]
Stead, Dominic [2 ,3 ]
Cordera, Ruben [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cantabria, Sch Civil Engn, Santander, Spain
[2] Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Espoo, Finland
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Autonomous vehicles; Urban planning; Backcasting; Q-method; Policy packaging; AUTOMATED VEHICLES; AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; URBAN TRANSPORT; ATTITUDES; CARE; ACCEPTABILITY; CHALLENGES; VISIONS; FUTURES; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2023.104535
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) can potentially bring about major changes in cities. Anticipatory planning approaches may provide valuable opportunities for fostering desirable transitions and pre-empting undesirable impacts. This research employs a combination of two methods to define the key policies to support a transition to the desirable driverless urban futures: the backcasting approach and the participatory Q-method. The combination of these techniques aims to identify different viewpoints about policies with the purpose of determining more effective and more acceptable options. The article analyses viewpoints from 20 citizens and 10 experts. The results point to the existence of two main viewpoints about the most and least desirable policies. The first viewpoint centres around increasing pedestrian mobility and promoting a more compact city. The second viewpoint centres around expanding transit-oriented development (TOD) and new networks of green spaces. Meanwhile, support for regulation-oriented policies to discourage the use of private motorised vehicles was relatively low. This research not only sheds light on the different viewpoints on the policies to achieve more desirable urban visions, it also illustrates the tensions and disagreements that may arise in the process of policy making.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] How much transport can the climate stand?: Sweden on a sustainable path in 2050
    Åkerman, J
    Höjer, M
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (14) : 1944 - 1957
  • [2] Banasick S., 2019, The Journal of Open Source Software, V4, P1360, DOI [10.21105/joss.01360, DOI 10.21105/JOSS.01360]
  • [3] Banister D., 2000, EUROPEAN TRANSPORT P
  • [4] Transport futures: Thinking the unthinkable
    Banister, David
    Hickman, Robin
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2013, 29 : 283 - 293
  • [5] Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review
    Bibri, Simon Elias
    Krogstie, John
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2017, 31 : 183 - 212
  • [6] Scenario types and techniques:: Towards a user's guide
    Borjeson, Lena
    Hojer, Mattlas
    Dreborg, Karl-Henrik
    Ekvall, Tomas
    Finnveden, Goran
    [J]. FUTURES, 2006, 38 (07) : 723 - 739
  • [7] The Stockholm congestion charges-5 years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt
    Borjesson, Maria
    Eliasson, Jonas
    Hugosson, Muriel B.
    Brundell-Freij, Karin
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2012, 20 : 1 - 12
  • [8] Bouton S., 2015, Urban mobility at a tipping point
  • [9] Brown S. R., 1980, POLITICAL SUBJECTIVI
  • [10] Sustainable urban mobility: One definition, different stakeholders' opinions
    Bruhova Foltynova, Hana
    Vejchodska, Eliska
    Rybova, Kristyna
    Kveton, Viktor
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 87