Association of deep phenotyping with diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing for fetal brain abnormalities

被引:3
|
作者
Drexler, Kathleen A. [1 ,5 ]
Talati, Asha N. [1 ]
Gilmore, Kelly L. [1 ]
Veazey, Rachel V. [1 ]
Powell, Bradford C. [2 ]
Weck, Karen E. [3 ]
Davis, Erica E. [4 ]
Vora, Neeta L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Pediat, Div Genet & Metab, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Genet, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, Stanley Manne Childrens Res Inst, Feinberg Sch Med,Dept Cell & Dev Biol,Dept Pediat, Chicago, IL USA
[5] 3010 Old Clin,CB 7516, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
Congenital anomalies; Deep phenotyping; Exome sequencing; Fetal brain anomalies; Prenatal diagnosis; ULTRASOUND; ANOMALIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.gim.2023.100915
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate whether deep prenatal phenotyping of fetal brain abnormalities (FBAs) increases diagnostic yield of trio-exome sequencing (ES) compared with standard phenotyping.Methods: Retrospective exploratory analysis of a multicenter prenatal ES study. Participants were eligible if an FBA was diagnosed and subsequently found to have a normal microarray. Deep phenotyping was defined as phenotype based on targeted ultrasound plus prenatal/post-natal magnetic resonance imaging, autopsy, and/or known phenotypes of other affected family members. Standard phenotyping was based on targeted ultrasound alone. FBAs were categorized by major brain findings on prenatal ultrasound. Cases with positive ES results were compared with those that have negative results by available phenotyping, as well as diagnosed FBAs.Results: A total of 76 trios with FBAs were identified, of which 25 (33%) cases had positive ES results and 51 (67%) had negative results. Individual modalities of deep phenotyping were not associated with diagnostic ES results. The most common FBAs identified were posterior fossa anomalies and midline defects. Neural tube defects were significantly associated with receipt of a negative ES result (0% vs 22%, P = .01).Conclusion: Deep phenotyping was not associated with increased diagnostic yield of ES for FBA in this small cohort. Neural tube defects were associated with negative ES results.& COPY; 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Whole exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis in cases with fetal anomalies: Criteria to improve diagnostic yield
    Yadava, Stacy M.
    Ashkinadze, Elena
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2019, 28 (02) : 251 - 255
  • [2] Prenatal Diagnostic Exome Sequencing: a Review
    Lauren E. Westerfield
    Alicia A. Braxton
    Magdalena Walkiewicz
    Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 2017, 5 (2) : 75 - 83
  • [3] Deep phenotyping and whole-exome sequencing improved the diagnostic yield for nuclear pedigrees with neurodevelopmental disorders
    Wang, Qingqing
    Tang, Xia
    Yang, Ke
    Huo, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Hui
    Ding, Keyue
    Liao, Shixiu
    MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (05):
  • [4] Diagnostic yield with exome sequencing in prenatal severe bilateral ventriculomegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mustafa, Hiba J.
    Sambatur, Enaja, V
    Barbera, Julie P.
    Pagani, Giorgio
    Yaron, Yuval
    Baptiste, Caitlin D.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Khalil, Asma
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (09)
  • [5] Incremental yield of prenatal exome sequencing in fetuses with skeletal system abnormalities: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yan
    Lv, Yuan
    Yao, Jia
    Ding, Hao
    Li, Gang
    Li, Jianmin
    Chen, Lizhu
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2025, 104 (04) : 604 - 614
  • [6] Update on the use of exome sequencing in the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities
    Ferretti, Lauren
    Mellis, Rhiannon
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2019, 62 (08)
  • [7] Exome Sequencing for Prenatal Detection of Genetic Abnormalities in Fetal Ultrasound Anomalies: An Economic Evaluation
    Kodabuckus, Shahela S.
    Quinlan-Jones, Elizabeth
    McMullan, Dominic J.
    Maher, Eamonn R.
    Hurles, Matthew E.
    Barton, Pelham M.
    Kilby, Mark D.
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2020, 47 (07) : 554 - 564
  • [8] Evaluation of Diagnostic Yield in Fetal Whole-Exome Sequencing: A Report on 45 Consecutive Families
    Greenbaum, Lior
    Pode-Shakked, Ben
    Eisenberg-Barzilai, Shlomit
    Dicastro-Keidar, Michal
    Bar-Ziv, Anat
    Goldstein, Nurit
    Reznik-Wolf, Haike
    Poran, Hana
    Rigbi, Amihai
    Barel, Ortal
    Bertoli-Avella, Aida M.
    Bauer, Peter
    Regev, Miriam
    Raas-Rothschildo, Annick
    Pras, Elon
    Berkenstadt, Michal
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2019, 10
  • [9] From diagnostic yield to clinical impact: a pilot study on the implementation of prenatal exome sequencing in routine care
    de Koning, Maayke A.
    Haak, Monique C.
    van Scheltema, Phebe N. Adama
    Peeters-Scholte, Cacha M. P. C. D.
    Koopmann, Tamara T.
    Nibbeling, Esther A. R.
    Aten, Emmelien
    den Hollander, Nicolette S.
    Ruivenkamp, Claudia A. L.
    Hoffer, Mariette J. V.
    Santen, Gijs W. E.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 21 (10) : 2303 - 2310
  • [10] Exome sequencing for perinatal phenotypes: The significance of deep phenotyping
    Aggarwal, Shagun
    Vineeth, Venugopal Satidevi
    Das Bhowmik, Aneek
    Tandon, Ashwani
    Kulkarni, Aditya
    Narayanan, Dhanya Lakshmi
    Bhattacherjee, Amrita
    Dalal, Ashwin
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2020, 40 (02) : 260 - 273