Prediction performance of the machine learning model in predicting mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Wang, Jue [1 ]
Yin, Ming Jing [1 ]
Wen, Han Chun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Emergency, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Intens Care Dept, Ward 1,6 Shuangyong Rd, Nanning, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Machine learning; Traumatic brain injury; Meta-analysis; Prediction; Mortality rate; Systematic review; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; DECISION-TREE ANALYSIS; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; REGRESSION-MODELS; IMPACT; CRASH; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-023-02247-8
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeWith the in-depth application of machine learning(ML) in clinical practice, it has been used to predict the mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries(TBI). However, there are disputes over its predictive accuracy. Therefore, we implemented this systematic review and meta-analysis, to explore the predictive value of ML for TBI.MethodologyWe systematically retrieved literature published in PubMed, Embase.com, Cochrane, and Web of Science as of November 27, 2022. The prediction model risk of bias(ROB) assessment tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the ROB of models and the applicability of reviewed questions. The random-effects model was adopted for the meta-analysis of the C-index and accuracy of ML models, and a bivariate mixed-effects model for the meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity.ResultA total of 47 papers were eligible, including 156 model, with 122 newly developed ML models and 34 clinically recommended mature tools. There were 98 ML models predicting the in-hospital mortality in patients with TBI; the pooled C-index, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.87), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.82), and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.92), respectively. There were 24 ML models predicting the out-of-hospital mortality; the pooled C-index, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.85), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.81), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.82), respectively. According to multivariate analysis, GCS score, age, CT classification, pupil size/light reflex, glucose, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) exerted the greatest impact on the model performance.ConclusionAccording to the systematic review and meta-analysis, ML models are relatively accurate in predicting the mortality of TBI. A single model often outperforms traditional scoring tools, but the pooled accuracy of models is close to that of traditional scoring tools. The key factors related to model performance include the accepted clinical variables of TBI and the use of CT imaging.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk factors for mortality in patients with dengue: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chagas, Gabriel Cavalcante Lima
    Rangel, Amanda Ribeiro
    Noronha, Luisa Macambira
    Veloso, Felipe Camilo Santiago
    Kassar, Samir Buainain
    Oliveira, Michelle Jacintha Cavalcante
    Meneses, Gdayllon Cavalcante
    da Silva Junior, Geraldo Bezerra
    Daher, Elizabeth De Francesco
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2022, 27 (08) : 656 - 668
  • [42] The predictive accuracy of machine learning for the risk of death in HIV patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yuefei
    Feng, Ying
    He, Qian
    Ni, Zhen
    Hu, Xiaoyuan
    Feng, Xinhuan
    Ni, Mingjian
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [43] Performance of machine learning algorithms for glioma segmentation of brain MRI: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Evi J. van Kempen
    Max Post
    Manoj Mannil
    Richard L. Witkam
    Mark ter Laan
    Ajay Patel
    Frederick J. A. Meijer
    Dylan Henssen
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 9638 - 9653
  • [44] The performance of machine learning for predicting the recurrent stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 24,350 patients
    Habibi, Mohammad Amin
    Rashidi, Farhang
    Mehrtabar, Ehsan
    Arshadi, Mohammad Reza
    Fallahi, Mohammad Sadegh
    Amirkhani, Nikan
    Hajikarimloo, Bardia
    Shafizadeh, Milad
    Majidi, Shahram
    Dmytriw, Adam A.
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA BELGICA, 2024, : 609 - 624
  • [45] Machine learning approaches for risk prediction after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zaka, Ammar
    Mutahar, Daud
    Gorcilov, James
    Gupta, Aashray K.
    Kovoor, Joshua G.
    Stretton, Brandon
    Mridha, Naim
    Sivagangabalan, Gopal
    Thiagalingam, Aravinda
    Chow, Clara K.
    Zaman, Sarah
    Jayasinghe, Rohan
    Kovoor, Pramesh
    Bacchi, Stephen
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL - DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 6 (01): : 23 - 44
  • [46] Citicoline for the Management of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury in the Acute Phase: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jose Secades, Julio
    Trimmel, Helmut
    Salazar, Byron
    Antonio Gonzalez, Jose
    LIFE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [47] Machine learning algorithms for predicting PTSD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vali, Masoumeh
    Nezhad, Hossein Motahari
    Kovacs, Levente
    Gandomi, Amir H.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [48] Prognostic Value of Initial Diagnostic Imaging Findings for Patient Outcomes in Adult Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yu, Hang
    Ande, Sudharsana Rao
    Batoo, Divjeet
    Linton, Janice
    Shankar, Jai
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 9 (02) : 509 - 528
  • [49] Machine learning in the prediction of post-stroke cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, XiaoSheng
    Chen, Zongning
    Jiao, Hexian
    Wang, BinYang
    Yin, Hui
    Chen, LuJia
    Shi, Hongling
    Yin, Yong
    Qin, Dongdong
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [50] Performance of machine learning algorithms for glioma segmentation of brain MRI: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    van Kempen, Evi J.
    Post, Max
    Mannil, Manoj
    Witkam, Richard L.
    Ter Laan, Mark
    Patel, Ajay
    Meijer, Frederick J. A.
    Henssen, Dylan
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (12) : 9638 - 9653