Prediction performance of the machine learning model in predicting mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Wang, Jue [1 ]
Yin, Ming Jing [1 ]
Wen, Han Chun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Emergency, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Intens Care Dept, Ward 1,6 Shuangyong Rd, Nanning, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Machine learning; Traumatic brain injury; Meta-analysis; Prediction; Mortality rate; Systematic review; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; DECISION-TREE ANALYSIS; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; REGRESSION-MODELS; IMPACT; CRASH; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-023-02247-8
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeWith the in-depth application of machine learning(ML) in clinical practice, it has been used to predict the mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries(TBI). However, there are disputes over its predictive accuracy. Therefore, we implemented this systematic review and meta-analysis, to explore the predictive value of ML for TBI.MethodologyWe systematically retrieved literature published in PubMed, Embase.com, Cochrane, and Web of Science as of November 27, 2022. The prediction model risk of bias(ROB) assessment tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the ROB of models and the applicability of reviewed questions. The random-effects model was adopted for the meta-analysis of the C-index and accuracy of ML models, and a bivariate mixed-effects model for the meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity.ResultA total of 47 papers were eligible, including 156 model, with 122 newly developed ML models and 34 clinically recommended mature tools. There were 98 ML models predicting the in-hospital mortality in patients with TBI; the pooled C-index, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.87), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.82), and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.92), respectively. There were 24 ML models predicting the out-of-hospital mortality; the pooled C-index, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.85), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.81), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.82), respectively. According to multivariate analysis, GCS score, age, CT classification, pupil size/light reflex, glucose, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) exerted the greatest impact on the model performance.ConclusionAccording to the systematic review and meta-analysis, ML models are relatively accurate in predicting the mortality of TBI. A single model often outperforms traditional scoring tools, but the pooled accuracy of models is close to that of traditional scoring tools. The key factors related to model performance include the accepted clinical variables of TBI and the use of CT imaging.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xie, Qi
    Wang, Xinglei
    Pei, Juhong
    Wu, Yinping
    Guo, Qiang
    Su, Yujie
    Yan, Hui
    Nan, Ruiling
    Chen, Haixia
    Dou, Xinman
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 23 (10) : 1655 - +
  • [32] Machine learning in the prediction of immunotherapy response and prognosis of melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Juan
    Dan, Kena
    Ai, Jun
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [33] Performance of machine learning algorithms for surgical site infection case detection and prediction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Guosong
    Khair, Shahreen
    Yang, Fengjuan
    Cheligeer, Cheligeer
    Southern, Danielle
    Zhang, Zilong
    Feng, Yuanchao
    Xu, Yuan
    Quan, Hude
    Williamson, Tyler
    Eastwood, Cathy A.
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 84
  • [34] Impact of intracranial pressure monitoring on mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yuan, Qiang
    Wu, Xing
    Sun, Yirui
    Yu, Jian
    Li, Zhiqi
    Du, Zhuoying
    Mao, Ying
    Zhou, Liangfu
    Hu, Jin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 122 (03) : 574 - 587
  • [35] The Efficacy of Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Prognosis of Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xu, Zhaohui
    Hu, Yinqin
    Shao, Xinyi
    Shi, Tianyun
    Yang, Jiahui
    Wan, Qiqi
    Liu, Yongming
    CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 150 (01) : 79 - 97
  • [36] The performance of machine learning models in predicting suicidal ideation, attempts, and deaths: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Kusuma, Karen
    Larsen, Mark
    Quiroz, Juan C.
    Gillies, Malcolm
    Burnett, Alexander
    Qian, Jiahui
    Torok, Michelle
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2022, 155 : 579 - 588
  • [37] Machine learning prediction of motor function in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Qinglin
    Chi, Lei
    Zhao, Weiying
    Wu, Lei
    Jiao, Chuanxu
    Zheng, Xue
    Zhang, Kaiyue
    Li, Xiaoning
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [38] Photobiomodulation in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Stevens, Andrew Robert
    Hadis, Mohammed
    Milward, Michael
    Ahmed, Zubair
    Belli, Antonio
    Palin, William
    Davies, David James
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2023, 40 (3-4) : 210 - 227
  • [39] Association of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio with mortality in patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Yuyang
    Tan, Yaheng
    Wan, Jun
    Chen, Qiwen
    Zheng, Yuxin
    Xu, Wenhao
    Wang, Peng
    Chong, Weelic
    Yu, Xueying
    Zhang, Yu
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (13)
  • [40] Machine learning models for risk prediction of cancer-associated thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Keya
    Zhang, Ying
    Zhang, Lufang
    Zhang, Wei
    Chen, Yu
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2025, 23 (02) : 610 - 626