Effect of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy on the Postoperative Course for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Farzat, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Weib, Peter [1 ]
Sukhanov, Iurii [1 ]
Rosenbauer, Josef [3 ]
Tanislav, Christian [3 ]
Wagenlehner, Florian M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Acad Teaching Hosp, Dept Urol & Robot Urol, Diakonie Klinikum Siegen, D-57074 Siegen, Germany
[2] Justus Liebig Univ Giessen, Dept Urol Pediat Urol & Androl, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
[3] Univ Bonn, Acad Teaching Hosp, Diakonie Klinkum Siegen, Dept Geriatr & Neurol, D-57074 Siegen, Germany
关键词
prostate cancer; RARP; neoadjuvant hormonal therapy; ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION; OBESE-PATIENTS; CANCER; RISK; BRACHYTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; RARP; MEN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12093053
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) preceding robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be beneficial in high-risk cases to facilitate surgical resection. Yet, its improvement in local tumor control is not obvious. Its benefit regarding overall cancer survival is also not evident, and it may worsen sexual and hormonal functions. This study explores the effect of NHT on the perioperative course after RARP. Methods: In this study, 500 patients from a tertiary referral center who underwent RARP by a specialized surgeon were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into two groups: the NHT (n = 55, 11%) group, which included patients who received NHT (median: 1 month prior to RARP), and the standard non-NHT (NNHT) group (n = 445, 89%). Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed. Postoperative results, complications, and readmission rates were compared between the groups. Results: NHT patients were heterogeneous from the rest regarding cancer parameters such as PSA (25 vs. 7.8 ng/mL) and tumor risk stratification, and they were more comorbid (p = 0.006 for the ASA score). They also received fewer nerve-sparing procedures (14.5% vs. 80.4%), while the operation time was similar. Positive surgical margins (PSM) (21.8% vs. 5.4%) and positive lymph nodes (PLN) (56.4% vs. 12.7%) were significantly higher in the NHT group compared to the non-NHT (NNHT) group. Hospital stay was equal, whereas catheter days were 3 days longer in the NHT group. NHT patients also suffered more minor vesicourethral-anastomosis-related complications. Major complications (p = 0.825) and readmissions (p = 0.070) did not differ between groups. Conclusion: Patients receiving NHT before RARP did not experience more major complications or readmissions within 90 days after surgery. Patients with unfavorable, high-risk tumors may benefit from NHT since it facilitates surgical resection. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to measure the advantages and disadvantages of NHT.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is not associated with early postoperative radiation therapy
    Chino, Junzo
    Schroeck, Florian R.
    Sun, Leon
    Lee, W. Robert
    Albala, David M.
    Moul, Judd W.
    Koontz, Bridget F.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (10) : 1496 - 1500
  • [42] The Effect of Ventilation with Individualized Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Postoperative Atelectasis in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Yoon, Hyun-Kyu
    Kim, Bo Rim
    Yoon, Susie
    Jeong, Young Hyun
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kim, Won Ho
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (04) : 1 - 14
  • [43] Is the elderly patient at increased risk when undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Capello, Seth A.
    Boczko, Judd
    Patel, Hitendra R. H.
    Joseph, Jean V.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 531 - 531
  • [44] Adequacy of lymphadenectomy among men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Kane, Christopher J.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (01) : 88 - 92
  • [45] A Predictive Preoperative and Postoperative Nomogram for Postoperative Potency Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Bhat, K. R. Seetharam
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Sandri, Marco
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Onol, Fikret F.
    Rogers, Travis
    Reddy, Sunil
    Noel, Jonathan
    Roof, Shannon
    Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Patel, Vipul R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 (04): : 942 - 951
  • [46] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: The learning curve
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 : A134 - A134
  • [47] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Is the Dust Settling?
    Menon, Mani
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) : 7 - 9
  • [48] Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Ready To Be Counted?
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Ghani, Khurshid R.
    Menon, Mani
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (01) : 16 - 18
  • [49] Improving the Evidence for Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (04) : 671 - 672
  • [50] Overcoming the challenges of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Goldstraw, M. A.
    Challacombe, B. J.
    Patil, K.
    Amoroso, P.
    Dasgupta, P.
    Kirby, R. S.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2012, 15 (01) : 1 - 7