Effect of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy on the Postoperative Course for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Farzat, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Weib, Peter [1 ]
Sukhanov, Iurii [1 ]
Rosenbauer, Josef [3 ]
Tanislav, Christian [3 ]
Wagenlehner, Florian M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Acad Teaching Hosp, Dept Urol & Robot Urol, Diakonie Klinikum Siegen, D-57074 Siegen, Germany
[2] Justus Liebig Univ Giessen, Dept Urol Pediat Urol & Androl, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
[3] Univ Bonn, Acad Teaching Hosp, Diakonie Klinkum Siegen, Dept Geriatr & Neurol, D-57074 Siegen, Germany
关键词
prostate cancer; RARP; neoadjuvant hormonal therapy; ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION; OBESE-PATIENTS; CANCER; RISK; BRACHYTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; RARP; MEN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12093053
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) preceding robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be beneficial in high-risk cases to facilitate surgical resection. Yet, its improvement in local tumor control is not obvious. Its benefit regarding overall cancer survival is also not evident, and it may worsen sexual and hormonal functions. This study explores the effect of NHT on the perioperative course after RARP. Methods: In this study, 500 patients from a tertiary referral center who underwent RARP by a specialized surgeon were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into two groups: the NHT (n = 55, 11%) group, which included patients who received NHT (median: 1 month prior to RARP), and the standard non-NHT (NNHT) group (n = 445, 89%). Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed. Postoperative results, complications, and readmission rates were compared between the groups. Results: NHT patients were heterogeneous from the rest regarding cancer parameters such as PSA (25 vs. 7.8 ng/mL) and tumor risk stratification, and they were more comorbid (p = 0.006 for the ASA score). They also received fewer nerve-sparing procedures (14.5% vs. 80.4%), while the operation time was similar. Positive surgical margins (PSM) (21.8% vs. 5.4%) and positive lymph nodes (PLN) (56.4% vs. 12.7%) were significantly higher in the NHT group compared to the non-NHT (NNHT) group. Hospital stay was equal, whereas catheter days were 3 days longer in the NHT group. NHT patients also suffered more minor vesicourethral-anastomosis-related complications. Major complications (p = 0.825) and readmissions (p = 0.070) did not differ between groups. Conclusion: Patients receiving NHT before RARP did not experience more major complications or readmissions within 90 days after surgery. Patients with unfavorable, high-risk tumors may benefit from NHT since it facilitates surgical resection. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to measure the advantages and disadvantages of NHT.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Postoperative urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Nilsson, Andreas
    Wiklund, Peter N.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 40 (02): : 103 - 107
  • [22] The Case for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Martinez-Salamanca, Juan I.
    Rao, Sandhya
    Ramanathan, Rajan
    Leung, Robert
    Mandhani, Anil
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (09) : 2039 - 2043
  • [23] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and a parachute
    Sood, Akshay
    Abdollah, Firas
    Menon, Mani
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (06) : 820 - +
  • [24] Anatomic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Joseph, J. V.
    Capello, S. A.
    Patel, H. P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 339 - 339
  • [25] EVOLUTION OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Orvieto, M. A.
    Patel, V. R.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 98 (02) : 76 - 88
  • [26] Salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Pereira, Claudio
    Palmer, Kenneth
    Patel, Vipul
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (04) : 686 - 687
  • [27] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Rotering, J.
    Siemer, S.
    Stoeckle, M.
    UROLOGE, 2008, 47 (04): : 420 - +
  • [28] The effect of peritoneal flap fixation on postoperative lymphocele formation in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Goezen, A. S.
    Senel, S.
    Koudonas, A.
    Rassweiler, J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 : S933 - S933
  • [29] Effect of Early Postoperative Rehabilitation on Length of Hospital Stay after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Higuchi, Shuto
    Matsugaki, Ryutaro
    Tomisaki, Ikko
    Fushimi, Kiyohide
    Matsuda, Shinya
    Saeki, Satoru
    PROGRESS IN REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2023, 8
  • [30] THE INCIDENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS IN PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Ozdemir, Ahmet Tunc
    Altinova, Serkan
    Serefoglu, Ege Can
    Cimen, Haci Ibrahim
    Koyuncu, Hakan Hasbey
    Balbay, Mevlana Derya
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A132 - A132