Effect of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy on the Postoperative Course for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Farzat, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Weib, Peter [1 ]
Sukhanov, Iurii [1 ]
Rosenbauer, Josef [3 ]
Tanislav, Christian [3 ]
Wagenlehner, Florian M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Acad Teaching Hosp, Dept Urol & Robot Urol, Diakonie Klinikum Siegen, D-57074 Siegen, Germany
[2] Justus Liebig Univ Giessen, Dept Urol Pediat Urol & Androl, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
[3] Univ Bonn, Acad Teaching Hosp, Diakonie Klinkum Siegen, Dept Geriatr & Neurol, D-57074 Siegen, Germany
关键词
prostate cancer; RARP; neoadjuvant hormonal therapy; ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION; OBESE-PATIENTS; CANCER; RISK; BRACHYTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; RARP; MEN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12093053
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) preceding robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may be beneficial in high-risk cases to facilitate surgical resection. Yet, its improvement in local tumor control is not obvious. Its benefit regarding overall cancer survival is also not evident, and it may worsen sexual and hormonal functions. This study explores the effect of NHT on the perioperative course after RARP. Methods: In this study, 500 patients from a tertiary referral center who underwent RARP by a specialized surgeon were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into two groups: the NHT (n = 55, 11%) group, which included patients who received NHT (median: 1 month prior to RARP), and the standard non-NHT (NNHT) group (n = 445, 89%). Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed. Postoperative results, complications, and readmission rates were compared between the groups. Results: NHT patients were heterogeneous from the rest regarding cancer parameters such as PSA (25 vs. 7.8 ng/mL) and tumor risk stratification, and they were more comorbid (p = 0.006 for the ASA score). They also received fewer nerve-sparing procedures (14.5% vs. 80.4%), while the operation time was similar. Positive surgical margins (PSM) (21.8% vs. 5.4%) and positive lymph nodes (PLN) (56.4% vs. 12.7%) were significantly higher in the NHT group compared to the non-NHT (NNHT) group. Hospital stay was equal, whereas catheter days were 3 days longer in the NHT group. NHT patients also suffered more minor vesicourethral-anastomosis-related complications. Major complications (p = 0.825) and readmissions (p = 0.070) did not differ between groups. Conclusion: Patients receiving NHT before RARP did not experience more major complications or readmissions within 90 days after surgery. Patients with unfavorable, high-risk tumors may benefit from NHT since it facilitates surgical resection. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to measure the advantages and disadvantages of NHT.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of sugammadex on processed EEG parameters in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Rubio-Baines, Inigo
    Honorato-Cia, Cristina
    Valencia, Miguel
    Panadero, Alfredo
    Cacho-Asenjo, Elena
    Manzanilla, Oscar
    Alegre, Manuel
    Nunez-Cordoba, Jorge M.
    Martinez-Simon, Antonio
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 131 (03) : 523 - 530
  • [2] Is rhabdomyolysis an anaesthetic complication in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Karaoren, Gulsah
    Bakan, Nurten
    Kucuk, Eyup Veli
    Gumus, Eyup
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2017, 13 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [3] Effects of lung protective ventilation on postoperative respiratory parameters in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Mette Mølsted
    Peter Ekeløf
    Jesper Nørgaard Bech
    Jost Wessels
    Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 14 : 509 - 516
  • [4] Effects of lung protective ventilation on postoperative respiratory parameters in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Molsted, Mette
    Ekelof, Peter
    Bech, Jesper Norgaard
    Wessels, Jost
    Jensen, Jorgen Bjerggaard
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2020, 14 (03) : 509 - 516
  • [5] Neoadjuvant hormonal deprivation for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy
    Gao, Xu
    Zhou, Tie
    Tang, Yuan-Jie
    Lu, Xin
    Sun, Ying-Hao
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 127 - 130
  • [6] ADVANTAGES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH NEOADJUVANT HORMONAL THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Shen, Zhoujun
    He, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 : A129 - A129
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of combination neoadjuvant chemo-hormonal therapy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for oligometastatic prostate cancer
    Kawase, Makoto
    Kato, Daiki
    Tobisawa, Yuki
    Iinuma, Koji
    Nakane, Keita
    Koie, Takuya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 31 (07) : 826 - 828
  • [8] A Retrospective Analysis of the Hemostatic Effect of FloSeal in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Martorana, Eugenio
    Ghaith, Ahmed
    Micali, Salvatore
    Pirola, Giacomo Maria
    De Carne, Cosimo
    Fidanza, Francesco
    Bianchi, Giampaolo
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 96 (03) : 274 - 279
  • [9] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in obese patients
    Boczko, J.
    Capello, S.
    Mathe, M.
    Erturk, E.
    Patel, H.
    Joseph, J. V.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A45 - A45
  • [10] Impacts of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Prior to Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Postoperative Hormonal- and Sexual-Related Quality of Life - Assessment by Patient-Reported Questionnaire
    Ogawa, Soichiro
    Hasegawa, Akihisa
    Makabe, Shunta
    Onagi, Akifumi
    Matsuoka, Kanako
    Kayama, Emina
    Koguchi, Tomoyuki
    Hata, Junya
    Sato, Yuichi
    Akaihata, Hidenori
    Kataoka, Masao
    Haga, Nobuhiro
    Kojima, Yoshiyuki
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2022, 14 : 39 - 48