Adapting Colorado River Basin Depletions to Available Water to Live within Our Means

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Jian [1 ]
Rosenberg, David E. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Utah Water Res Lab, 8200 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, UtahWater Res Lab, 8200 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5555
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Colorado River's two largest reservoirs are drawing down because releases exceed inflows and releases adapt to reservoir elevations instead of to elevation and inflow triggers. To help slow reservoir drawdown and sustain target elevations, we introduce a new rule that adapts basin depletions to available water. We simulated inflow-based operations and validated existing operations in a new open-source exploratory model for the Colorado River Basin. We developed the exploratory model to more easily adapt Upper and Lower Basin depletions to available water, reduce run time, and lower costs to use compared with the proprietary RiverWare Colorado River Simulation System (CRSS) model. We simulated adaptive and existing operations for (1) the 2000-2018 period, and (2) scenarios of steady Lees Ferry natural inflow each year of 17.3-6.2 billion m3 (bcm) [14-5 million acre-ft (maf)] per year. We found the following: (1) the existing rules drew down Lake Powell and Lake Mead to their critical storages of 7.4 bcm (6.0 maf) in less than 5 years when Lees Ferry natural flow was less than 15.3 bcm/year (12.4 maf/year) (the 2000-2018 period average); and (2) the adaptive rule sustained both reservoirs above their critical levels for long periods by requiring Upper and Lower Basin users to conserve as much as 1.2 bcm (1.0 maf) per year more water than existing operations. The next steps should be testing the adaptive rule in CRSS and devising conservation programs that can adapt and scale to available water.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] GROUND-WATER SALINITY PROBLEMS RELATED TO IRRIGATION IN COLORADO RIVER BASIN
    ELASHRY, MT
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1978, 59 (12): : 1064 - 1064
  • [42] Simplified agricultural water use accounting in the Colorado River Basin using OpenET
    Wobus, Cameron
    Nash, Caroline
    Culp, Peter
    Kelly, Mary
    Kennedy, Kelly
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [43] SOME REMARKS ON ENERGY RELATED WATER ISSUES IN UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN
    BROWN, FL
    SAWYER, JW
    KHOSHAKHLAGH, R
    NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL, 1977, 17 (04) : 635 - 648
  • [44] Surface Water Supply of the-1921, pt 9, Colorado River Basin
    Dietrich, Br.
    PETERMANNS MITTEILUNGEN, 1929, 75 (5-6): : 156 - 156
  • [45] Changing climatic conditions in the Colorado River Basin: Implications for water resources management
    Dawadi, Srijana
    Ahmad, Sajjad
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 430 : 127 - 141
  • [46] Data Analysis to Evaluate the Influence of Drought on Water Quality in the Colorado River Basin
    Vallese, Federico Danilo
    Trillini, Mariano
    Guerra, Luciana Dunel
    Pistonesi, Marcelo Fabian
    Pierini, Jorge Omar
    WATER, 2024, 16 (19)
  • [47] Evaluating Landsat 8 evapotranspiration for water use mapping in the Colorado River Basin
    Senay, Gabriel B.
    Friedrichs, MacKenzie
    Singh, Ramesh K.
    Velpuri, Naga Manohar
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 185 : 171 - 185
  • [48] Models, assumptions, and stakeholders: Planning for water supply variability in the Colorado River Basin
    Garrick, Dustin
    Jacobs, Katharine
    Garfin, Gregg
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2008, 44 (02): : 381 - 398
  • [49] Warming may create substantial water supply shortages in the Colorado River basin
    McCabe, Gregory J.
    Wolock, David M.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 34 (22)
  • [50] IMPACT OF ENERGY DEVELOPMENT UPON WATER AND SALINITY IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN
    FLUG, M
    WALKER, WR
    SKOGERBOE, GV
    WATER SUPPLY & MANAGEMENT, 1982, 6 (1-2): : 199 - 220