Conization before radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A Korean multicenter study (COBRA-R)

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, Se Ik [1 ]
Nam, So Hyun [2 ]
Hwangbo, Suhyun [3 ]
Kim, Yeorae [4 ]
Cho, Hyun-Woong [5 ]
Suh, Dong Hoon [1 ,4 ]
Song, Jae Yun [6 ]
Kim, Jae-Weon [1 ]
Choi, Chel Hun [7 ,9 ]
Kim, Dae-Yeon [2 ,10 ]
Lee, Maria [1 ,8 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Genom Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seongnam, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[5] Korea Univ, Guro Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Korea Univ, Anam Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
[9] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, 81 Irwon ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
[10] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, 88 Olymp ro 43 gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[11] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, 101 Daehak ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
关键词
Cervical cancer; Conization; Radical hysterectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Laparoscopic surgery; Recurrence; Survival; Prognosis; RECURRENCE; ADENOCARCINOMA; PROPENSITY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To investigate the impact of conization on survival outcomes and to identify a specific population that might benefit from conization before radical hysterectomy (RH) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.Methods. From six institutions in Korea, we identified node-negative, margin-negative, parametria-negative, 2009 FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer patients who underwent primary type C RH between 2006 and 2021. The patients were divided into multiple groups based on tumor size, surgical approach, and histology. We performed a series of independent 1:1 propensity score matching and compared the survival outcomes between the conization and non-conization groups.Results. In total, 1254 patients were included: conization (n = 355) and non-conization (n = 899). Among the matched patients with a tumor size of >2 cm, the conization group showed a significantly better 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate compared with the non-conization group when RH was conducted via minimally invasive surgery (MIS), in those with squamous cell carcinoma (96.3% vs. 87.4%, P = 0.007) and non-squamous cell carcinoma (97.0% vs. 74.8%, P = 0.021). However, no difference in DFS was observed between the two groups among the matched patients with a tumor size of <= 2 cm, regardless of surgical approach or histological type. In patients who underwent MIS RH, DFS significantly worsened as the residual tumor size increased (P < 0.001).Conclusion. Cervical conization was associated with a lower recurrence rate in patients with early-stage cervical cancer with a tumor size of >2 cm who underwent primary MIS RH. Cervical conization may be per-formed prior to MIS RH to minimize the uterine residual tumor.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 97
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes
    Leitao, Mario M.
    Zhou, Qin C.
    Brandt, Benny
    Iasonos, Alexia
    Sioulas, Vasileios
    Mager, Katherine Lavigne
    Shahin, Mark
    Bruce, Shaina
    Black, Destin R.
    Kay, Carrie G.
    Gandhi, Meeli
    Qayyum, Maira
    Scalici, Jennifer
    Jones, Nathaniel L.
    Paladugu, Rajesh
    Brown, Jubilee
    Naumann, R. Wendel
    Levine, Monica D.
    Mendivil, Alberto
    Lim, Peter C.
    Kang, Elizabeth
    Cantrell, Leigh A.
    Sullivan, Mackenzie W.
    Martino, Martin A.
    Kratz, Melissa K.
    Kolev, Valentin
    Tomita, Shannon
    Leath III, Charles A.
    Boitano, Teresa K. L.
    Doo, David W.
    Feltmate, Colleen
    Sugrue, Ronan
    Olawaiye, Alexander B.
    Goldfeld, Ester
    Ferguson, Sarah E.
    Suhner, Jessa
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 166 (03) : 417 - 424
  • [22] Outcomes after radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix
    Park, J-Y
    Kim, D-Y
    Kim, J-H
    Kim, Y-M
    Kim, Y-T
    Nam, J-H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 102 (12) : 1692 - 1698
  • [23] The impact of close surgical margins after radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    McCann, Georgia A.
    Taege, Susanne K.
    Boutsicaris, Christina E.
    Phillips, Gary S.
    Eisenhauer, Eric L.
    Fowler, Jeffrey M.
    O'Malley, David M.
    Copeland, Larry J.
    Cohn, David E.
    Salani, Ritu
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 128 (01) : 44 - 48
  • [24] Outcomes of Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma, with or without Prior Cervical Excision Procedure
    Nasioudis, Dimitrios
    Labban, Nayla
    Gysler, Stefan
    Ko, Emily M.
    Giuntoli II, Robert L.
    Kim, Sarah H.
    Latif, Nawar A.
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (11)
  • [25] Risk Factors for Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Ponce, Jordi
    Fernandez-Gonzalez, Sergi
    Gil-Moreno, Antonio
    Coronado, Pluvio J.
    De la Rosa, Jesus
    Nabais, Henrique
    Hernandez, Gines
    Taltavull, Anna
    Gilabert-Estelles, Juan
    Martinez-Roman, Sergio
    Barahona, Manel
    Barahona, Marc
    Martinez-Maestre, Maria Angeles
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (11) : 1 - 11
  • [26] Parametrial Involvement in Radical Hysterectomy Specimens for Women With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Sun, Charlotte C.
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    Deavers, Michael T.
    dos Reis, Ricardo
    Levenback, Charles F.
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (01) : 93 - 99
  • [27] Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation
    Bansal, Nisha
    Herzog, Thomas J.
    Shaw, Richard E.
    Burke, William M.
    Deutsch, Israel
    Wright, Jason D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (05) : 485.e1 - 485.e9
  • [28] Postoperative Nomogram Predicting Risk of Recurrence After Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Kim, Mi-Kyung
    Jo, Hoenil
    Kong, Hyoun-Joong
    Kim, Hee Chan
    Kim, Jae Weon
    Kim, Yong-Man
    Song, Yong-Sang
    Kang, Soon-Beom
    Mok, Jung-Eun
    Lee, Hyo Pyo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2010, 20 (09) : 1581 - 1586
  • [29] Comparison of outcomes of laparotomic and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer
    Chang, Shu-Han
    Huang, Kuan-Gen
    Yang, Lan-Yan
    Pan, Yu-Bin
    Lai, Chyong-Huey
    Chou, Hung-Hsueh
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 (05)
  • [30] Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Di Donato, Violante
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    Chiantera, Vito
    Sozzi, Giulio
    D'Auge, Tullio Golia
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
    D'Oria, Ottavia
    Vizza, Enrico
    Giannini, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (18)