Optimization of Transspinal Stimulation Applications for Motor Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury: Scoping Review

被引:12
|
作者
Rehman, Muhammad Uzair [1 ,2 ]
Sneed, Dustin [3 ]
Sutor, Tommy W. [1 ]
Hoenig, Helen [4 ,5 ]
Gorgey, Ashraf S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Med Ctr, Spinal Cord Injury & Disorders, Richmond, VA 23249 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[4] Durham VA Hlth Care Syst, Phys Med & Rehabil Serv, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Geriatr Div, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
transspinal stimulation; transcutaneous; motor outcomes; spinal cord; TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; ACTIVATION; PATTERN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12030854
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition that can significantly affect an individual's life, causing paralysis, autonomic dysreflexia, and chronic pain. Transspinal stimulation (TSS) is a non-invasive form of neuromodulation that activates the underlying neural circuitries of the spinal cord. Application of TSS can be performed through multiple stimulation protocols, which may vary in the electrodes' size or position as well as stimulation parameters, and which may influence the response of motor functions to the stimulation. Due to the novelty of TSS, it is beneficial to summarize the available evidence to identify the range of parameters that may provide the best outcomes for motor response. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies examining the effects of TSS on limb motor function. A literature search yielded 34 studies for analysis, in which electrode placement and stimulation parameters varied considerably. The stimulation protocols from each study and their impact on limb motor function were summarized. Electrode placement was variable based on the targeted limb. Studies for the upper limbs targeted the cervical enlargement with anatomical placement of the cathode over the cervical vertebral region. In lower-limb studies, the cathode(s) were placed over the thoracic and lumbar vertebral regions, to target the lumbar enlargement. The effects of carrier frequency were inconclusive across the studies. Multisite cathodal placements yielded favorable motor response results compared to single-site placement. This review briefly summarized the current mechanistic evidence of the effect of TSS on motor response after SCI. Our findings indicate that optimization of stimulation parameters will require future randomized controlled studies to independently assess the effects of different stimulation parameters under controlled circumstances.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Motor Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
    Megia Garcia, Alvaro
    Serrano-Munoz, Diego
    Taylor, Julian
    Avendano-Coy, Juan
    Gomez-Soriano, Julio
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2020, 34 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [2] Uncontrollable stimulation undermines recovery after spinal cord injury
    Grau, JW
    Washburn, SN
    Hook, MA
    Ferguson, AR
    Crown, ED
    Garcia, G
    Bolding, KA
    Miranda, RC
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2004, 21 (12) : 1795 - 1817
  • [3] Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats
    Yang, Qi
    Ramamurthy, Aditya
    Lall, Sophia
    Santos, Joshua
    Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan
    Lopane, Madeleine
    Zareen, Neela
    Alexander, Heather
    Ryan, Daniel
    Martin, John H.
    Carmel, Jason B.
    EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2019, 320
  • [4] Transspinal stimulation increases motoneuron output of multiple segments in human spinal cord injury
    Murray, Lynda M.
    Knikou, Maria
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [5] Priming locomotor training with transspinal stimulation in people with spinal cord injury: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial
    Skiadopoulos, Andreas
    Famodimu, Grace O.
    Solomon, Shammah K.
    Agarwal, Parul
    Harel, Noam Y.
    Knikou, Maria
    TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [6] Uncontrollable stimulation undermines recovery of function after spinal cord injury
    Washburn, SN
    Hook, MA
    Ferguson, AR
    Crown, ED
    Garcia, G
    Bolding, KA
    Miranda, RC
    Grau, JW
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2004, 21 (09) : 1291 - 1291
  • [7] The Effectiveness of Paired Associative Stimulation on Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Scoping Review
    Baroni, Andrea
    Antonioni, Annibale
    Fregna, Giulia
    Lamberti, Nicola
    Manfredini, Fabio
    Koch, Giacomo
    D'Ausilio, Alessandro
    Straudi, Sofia
    NEUROLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 16 (03): : 567 - 589
  • [8] Forecasting motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury: Value of MR imaging
    Flanders, AE
    Spettell, CM
    Tartaglino, LM
    Friedman, DP
    Herbison, GJ
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (03) : 649 - 655
  • [9] Priming locomotor training with transspinal stimulation in people with spinal cord injury: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial
    Andreas Skiadopoulos
    Grace O. Famodimu
    Shammah K. Solomon
    Parul Agarwal
    Noam Y. Harel
    Maria Knikou
    Trials, 24
  • [10] Effect of Smoking on Motor Recovery After Cervical American Spinal Injury Association Grade D Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
    Moon, Tyler James
    Furdock, Ryan
    Blackburn, Collin
    Ahn, Nicholas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 17 (02) : 179 - 184