Minimally Invasive Surgery for Genitourinary Trauma: A Nationwide Outcomes-Based Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Collins, William James [1 ]
El-Qawaqzeh, Khaled [1 ]
Ditillo, Michael [1 ]
Hosseinpour, Hamidreza [1 ]
Nelson, Adam [1 ]
Bhogadi, Sai Krishna [1 ]
Castanon, Lourdes [1 ]
Gries, Lynn [1 ]
Anand, Tanya [1 ]
Joseph, Bellal [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Crit Care Burns & Emergency Surg, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Crit Care & Emergency Surg, 1501 N Campbell Ave,Room 5411,POB 245063, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
关键词
Bladder injury; Open versus laparoscopic repair; Trauma Quality Improvement  Program; Trauma; Ureteral injury; ABDOMINAL-TRAUMA; LAPAROSCOPY; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; INJURIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2022.09.015
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Bladder and ureteral injuries are uncommon in trauma patients but are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Patients presenting with such injuries may undergo either open surgical repair or laparoscopic repair. We aimed to compare outcomes of open surgical approach and laparoscopy in trauma patients with isolated bladder and ureteral injury. We hypothesized that laparoscopy is associated with improved outcomes.Methods: We performed a 2017 review of American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program and identified trauma patients with bladder and ureteral injury who underwent open surgical repair or laparoscopy. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed adjusting for demographics, emergency department vitals (systolic blood pressure, heart rate, Glasgow Coma Scale), mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, each body region Abbreviated Injury Scale score, and transfusion units. Outcomes were rates of in-hospital major complications and mortality.Results: Of the 1,004,440 trauma patients, 384 patients (open: 192 and laparoscopy: 192) were matched and included. The mean age was 36 +/- 15 y, Injury Severity Score was 27 [27-48], 77% were males, and 56% of patients had a blunt mechanism of injury, and 44% had penetrating injuries. Overall mortality was 7.3%. On univariate analysis, mortality was lower in the open group as compared to the laparoscopy group (10.4% versus 4.2%, P = 0.019) and survivor-only hospital length of stay was longer in the open group (8 [8-9] versus 7 [5-11], P = 0.008). There was no difference in overall major complications (23% versus 21%, P = 0.621). On multivariate analysis, open surgical repair was independently associated with lower odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 0.405, 95% confidence interval: [0.17-0.95], P-value = 0.038)Conclusions: In our analysis open surgical repair of bladder and ureteral injuries was associated with lower mortality with other outcomes being similar when compared to laparoscopy. Laparoscopic surgical repair may not have an advantage over the open sur-gical repair for bladder and ureteral injuries. Further prospective studies are needed to delineate the ideal surgical approach for these injuries.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 136
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis
    Nagpal, Kamal
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Vats, Amit
    Yakoub, Danny
    James, David
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Darzi, Ara
    Moorthy, Krishna
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (07): : 1621 - 1629
  • [42] Long-term oncological outcomes for minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer-a population-based nationwide study with a non-inferiority design
    Jadid, Kaveh Dehlaghi
    Cao, Yang
    Petersson, Josefin
    Sjovall, Annika
    Angenete, Eva
    Matthiessen, Peter
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 25 (05) : 954 - 963
  • [43] Diffusion, outcomes and implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery: a snapshot from the I Go MILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) Registry
    Luca Aldrighetti
    Francesca Ratti
    Umberto Cillo
    Alessandro Ferrero
    Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
    Alfredo Guglielmi
    Felice Giuliante
    Fulvio Calise
    Updates in Surgery, 2017, 69 : 271 - 283
  • [44] Evaluating nationwide application of minimally invasive surgery for small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms and the impact on survival
    Kacmaz, E.
    Klumpen, H. J.
    Bemelman, W. A.
    van Dijkum, Nieveen E. J. M.
    Engelsman, A. F.
    Tanis, P. J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 33 : 208 - 208
  • [45] Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic safety analysis
    Ko, Kinsing
    de Kroon, Thom L.
    Post, Marco C.
    Kelder, Johannes C.
    Schut, Karen F.
    Saouti, Nabil
    van Putte, Bart P.
    OPEN HEART, 2020, 7 (02):
  • [46] Elective minimally invasive surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis: operative outcomes of patients with complicated versus uncomplicated disease
    Mizrahi, Ido
    Abu-Gazala, Mahmoud
    Fernandez, Laura M.
    Krizzuk, Dimitri
    Ioannidis, Argyrios
    Wexner, Steven D.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (11) : 2948 - 2954
  • [47] Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Contributions in Minimally Invasive General Surgery
    Antoniou, Stavros A.
    Lasithiotakis, Konstantinos
    Koch, Oliver O.
    Antoniou, George A.
    Pointner, Rudolph
    Granderath, Frank A.
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (01) : 26 - 30
  • [48] Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of thoraco lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis: indications and outcomes
    Pola, E.
    Pambianco, V
    Autore, G.
    Cipolloni, V
    Fantoni, M.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 23 : 94 - 100
  • [49] Minimally invasive surgery versus open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: A systematic review and meta analysis
    Lei, Jiao
    Huang, Junmin
    Yang, Xiaobo
    Zhang, Yuan
    Yao, Kecheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 51 : 191 - 198
  • [50] Carbon footprints in minimally invasive surgery: Good patient outcomes, but costly for the environment
    Chan, Kai Siang
    Lo, Hong Yee
    Shelat, Vishal G.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2023, 15 (07): : 1277 - 1285