Differentiated participation, uniform procedures: EU agencies in direct policy implementation

被引:2
作者
Akbik, Adina [1 ]
Freudlsperger, Christian [2 ]
Migliorati, Marta [3 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Inst Polit Sci, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Ctr Comparat & Int Studies, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Malta, Inst European Studies, Msida, Malta
关键词
European Union agencies; differentiated integration; EU policy implementation; Europol; European Asylum Support Office; EUROPEAN-UNION; INTEGRATION; POLITICS; STATES; LAW;
D O I
10.1080/01402382.2022.2161727
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
European Union (EU) institutions have become increasingly involved in direct policy implementation in the member states, creating a new domain of differentiation in EU governance. What brings about such differentiation, and how does it vary across policy fields? Drawing on theories of differentiated integration, this article argues that differentiated implementation occurs at the intersection of postfunctional obstacles (politicisation) and functional pressures for joint implementation (interdependence). There are two identified dimensions of direct implementation, a territorial one referring to states' participation in such activities, and a procedural one capturing the degree of uniformity in the guidelines for organising implementation. The resulting typology is applied to direct implementation activities (DIAs) conducted by EU agencies alongside national authorities. The qualitative analysis reveals that differentiated participation is a stable feature of DIAs in politicised fields, and although there is a tendency to create more uniform procedures over time and across policy fields, higher uniformity prevails under symmetric interdependence.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 670
页数:26
相关论文
共 72 条
[11]  
Claes Ana Laura, 2021, European Papers, V6, P357
[12]   A New Agency Is Born in the European Union: The European Asylum Support Office [J].
Comte, Francoise .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MIGRATION AND LAW, 2010, 12 (04) :373-405
[13]  
Dijkstra H., 2017, The Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations in World Politics, P97
[14]   Explaining legal implementation zn the European Union [J].
Duina, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIOLOGY OF LAW, 1997, 25 (02) :155-179
[15]  
Dyson K, 2010, PALGRAVE STUD EUR UN, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230289529
[16]   The quest for order: unravelling the relationship between the European Commission and European Union agencies [J].
Egeberg, Morten ;
Trondal, Jarle ;
Vestlund, Nina M. .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 22 (05) :609-629
[17]  
EMSA, 2004, 8 M ADM BOARD POL VI
[18]  
EMSA, 2022, LEG TEXTS EUR MAR SA
[19]  
EMSA, 2015, METH VIS MEMB STAT
[20]  
EUAA, 2022, EUAA PERS DEPL ROM P