How to make big decisions: A cross-sectional study on the decision making process in life choices

被引:6
作者
Savioni, Lucrezia [1 ,2 ]
Triberti, Stefano [1 ,2 ]
Durosini, Ilaria [2 ]
Pravettoni, Gabriella [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Oncol & Hematooncol, Via Festa Perdono 7, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[2] European Inst Oncol IRCCS, Appl Res Div Cognit & Psychol Sci, IEO, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, I-20141 Milan, Italy
关键词
Decision making; Life choice; System; 1; 2; Personality traits; PERSON-ENVIRONMENT FIT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; JOB-SATISFACTION; SELF-ESTEEM; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ATTACHMENT STYLE; CAREER IDENTITY; TRAIT ANXIETY; SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-022-02792-x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
People often make life choices that will affect their future (e.g. getting married). However, research on decision making focuses more on abstract dilemmas than on decision making. The aim of this study is threefold: to analyze (1) whether people rely mainly on intuitive or rational processing (System 1 or 2) when making life choices; (2) whether some characteristics of recalled life choices (e.g., difficulty in making the decision) differ between life areas (sentimental and work contexts); (3) whether personality traits and System 1 or 2 utilization may predict final satisfaction in life choices. By conducting a cross-sectional study on 188 participants' recall of selected life decisions (in the sentimental and work life areas) we found that System 1 is more involved than System 2 in sentimental choices while the opposite happens for work ones. Lastly, satisfaction in life choices is partially predicted by the involvement of cognitive systems and individual differences, with different predictors emerging across life areas. Discussion suggests directions for future research on naturalistic decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:15223 / 15236
页数:14
相关论文
共 141 条
  • [1] Abbey E., 2005, Qualitative Social Research, V6, DOI [10.17169/fqs-6.1.515, DOI 10.17169/FQS-6.1.515]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, Understanding emotions
  • [3] Separate and unequal: The effect of unequal access to employment-based health insurance on same-sex and unmarried different-sex couples
    Ash, Michael A.
    Badgett, M. V. Lee
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2006, 24 (04) : 582 - 599
  • [4] Why Mate Choices are not as Reciprocal as we Assume: The Role of Personality, Flirting and Physical Attractiveness
    Back, Mitja D.
    Penke, Lars
    Schmukle, Stefan C.
    Sachse, Karoline
    Borkenau, Peter
    Asendorpf, Jens B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2011, 25 (02) : 120 - 132
  • [5] Patient Preferences as Guidance for Information Framing in a Medical Shared Decision-Making Approach: The Bridge Between Nudging and Patient Preferences
    Bailo, Luca
    Vergani, Laura
    Pravettoni, Gabriella
    [J]. PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2019, 13 : 2225 - 2231
  • [6] Partner choice versus punishment in human Prisoner's Dilemmas
    Barclay, Pat
    Raihani, Nichola
    [J]. EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 37 (04) : 263 - 271
  • [7] Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles?
    Baumeister, RF
    Campbell, JD
    Krueger, JI
    Vohs, KD
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, : 1 - 44
  • [8] Beach L.R., 2017, Decision Making, V85, P835, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781315095080-5, 10.4324/9781315095080-5]
  • [9] Beach L.R., 2005, The psychology of decision making: People in organizations
  • [10] Bell B. S., 2008, CTR ADV HUMAN RESOUR, P8