How Much Can Machines Learn Finance from Chinese Text Data?

被引:6
|
作者
Zhou, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Jianqing [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Xue, Lirong [4 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Inst Big Data, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, MOE Lab Natl Dev & Intelligent Governance, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Int Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
[4] Princeton Univ, Dept Operat Res & Financial Engn, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[5] Fudan Univ, Sch Data Sci, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
machine learning; FarmPredict; factor model; sparse regression; textual analysis; INVESTOR SENTIMENT; STOCK; RETURNS; NUMBER; RISK; NEWS;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2022.01468
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
How much can we learn finance directly from text data? This paper presents a new framework for learning textual data based on the factor augmentation model and sparsity regularization, called the factor -augmented regularized model for prediction (FarmPredict), to let machines learn financial returns directly from news. FarmPredict allows the model itself to extract information directly from articles without predefined information, such as dictionaries or pretrained models as in most studies. Using unsupervised learned factors to augment the predictors would benefit our method with a "doublerobust" feature: that the machine would learn to balance between individual words or text factors/topics. It also avoids the information loss of factor regression in dimensionality reduction. We apply our model to the Chinese stock market with a large proportion of retail investors by using Chinese news data to predict financial returns. We show that positive sentiments scored by our FarmPredict approach from news generate on average 83 basic points (bps) stock daily excess returns, and negative news has an adverse impact of 26 bps on the days of news announcements, where both effects can last for a few days. This asymmetric effect aligns well with the short -sale constraints in the Chinese equity market. The result shows that the machine -learned prediction does provide sizeable predictive power with an annualized return of 54% at most with a simple investment strategy. Compared with other statistical and machine learning methods, FarmPredict significantly outperforms them on model prediction and portfolio performance. Our study demonstrates the of machines to learn text data.
引用
收藏
页码:8962 / 8987
页数:27
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Machine learning in neurology: what neurologists can learn from machines and vice versa
    Rose Bruffaerts
    Journal of Neurology, 2018, 265 : 2745 - 2748
  • [2] Machine learning in neurology: what neurologists can learn from machines and vice versa
    Bruffaerts, Rose
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2018, 265 (11) : 2745 - 2748
  • [3] Finance research over 40 years: What can we learn from machine learning?
    Liu, Po-Yu
    Wang, Zigan
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OF ECONOMICS, 2024, 19 (04): : 472 - 507
  • [4] How AI Can Help Learn Lessons from Incident Reporting Systems
    Dillon, Robin
    Madsen, Peter
    Holland, Brian
    Cao, Danniel
    2024 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2024,
  • [5] What can we learn from telematics car driving data: A survey
    Gao, Guangyuan
    Meng, Shengwang
    Wuthrich, Mario V.
    INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2022, 104 : 185 - 199
  • [6] What Can We Learn from Registry Data on Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes?
    Lameire, Norbert
    Van Biesen, Wim
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS - FROM BASIC CONCEPTS TO CLINICAL EXCELLENCE, 2009, 163 : 227 - 236
  • [7] How much do we learn? Measuring symmetric and asymmetric deviations from Bayesian updating through choices
    Aydogan, Ilke
    Baillon, Aurelien
    Kemel, Emmanuel
    Li, Chen
    QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS, 2025, 16 (01) : 329 - 365
  • [8] Data analytics in pediatric cardiac intensive care: How and what can we learn to improve care
    Goldsmith, Michael P.
    Schwartz, Emily J.
    Hehir, David A.
    PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 59
  • [9] Machines Learn Better with Better Data Ontology: Lessons from Philosophy of Induction and Machine Learning Practice
    Dan Li
    Minds and Machines, 2023, 33 : 429 - 450
  • [10] Machines Learn Better with Better Data Ontology: Lessons from Philosophy of Induction and Machine Learning Practice
    Li, Dan
    MINDS AND MACHINES, 2023, 33 (03) : 429 - 450