Adaptive Processing in Word Production: Evidence From Picture-Word Interference Studies

被引:1
|
作者
Jescheniak, Joerg D. [1 ,3 ]
Woehner, Stefan [1 ]
Schriefers, Herbert [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Wilhelm Wundt Inst Psychol, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Leipzig, Wilhelm Wundt Inst Psychol, Neumarkt 9-19, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
word production; picture-word interference; adaptive processes; semantic interference; repeated naming; SPREADING-ACTIVATION THEORY; SEMANTIC INTERFERENCE; LEXICAL ACCESS; LANGUAGE PRODUCTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION; NAMING EVIDENCE; TIME COURSE; DISTRACTOR PICTURES; SPOKEN PRODUCTION; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1037/xlm0001316
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Adaptive models of word production hold that lexical processing is shaped by recent production episodes. In particular, the models proposed by Howard et al. (2006) and Oppenheim et al. (2010) assume that the connection strength between semantic and lexical representations is updated continuously, on each use of a word. These changes make semantically related competitor words to a selected target word (e.g., "cherry" or "grape" for the target word "apple") less accessible for future retrieval. We put this assumption to a novel test in two picture-word interference experiments. The experiments looked at semantic interference (longer picture naming latencies in the presence of a semantically related distractor word compared to an unrelated distractor word; the effect is assumed to reflect the activation of competitor words to a target word) and its development across repeated naming. Across two times of measurement, semantically related distractor words (and their unrelated controls) were either identical (fixed target-distractor mapping, e.g., either distractor "cherry" or distractor "grape" for the target word "apple" at both times of measurement) or different (variable target-distractor mapping, e.g., distractor "cherry" at first time of measurement and distractor "grape" at second time of measurement or vice versa). Semantic interference was reduced at the second time of measurement, and this reduction was found with both fixed and variable target-distractor mapping. This generalization to new target-distractor combinations provides strong novel support for the notion of production-dependent changes in lexical accessibility as captured by adaptive models of word production.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1094
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Distinguishing Target From Distractor in Stroop, Picture-Word, and Word-Word Interference Tasks
    Schmalz, Xenia
    Treccani, Barbara
    Mulatti, Claudio
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [22] Lexical selection in bimodal bilinguals: ERP evidence from picture-word interference
    Emmorey, Karen
    Mott, Megan
    Meade, Gabriela
    Holcomb, Phillip J.
    Midgley, Katherine J.
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 36 (07) : 840 - 853
  • [23] No lexical competition without priming: Evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm
    Gauvin, Hanna S.
    Jonen, Magdalena K.
    Choi, Jessica
    McMahon, Katie
    de Zubicaray, Greig I.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 71 (12): : 2562 - 2570
  • [24] Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks
    Damian, MF
    Bowers, JS
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (01) : 111 - 117
  • [25] Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks
    Markus F. Damian
    Jeffrey S. Bowers
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2003, 10 : 111 - 117
  • [26] Picture-word interference effects on naming in Chinese
    Weekes, B
    Davies, R
    Chen, MJ
    COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE STUDIES OF THE CHINESE LANGUAGE, 2002, : 101 - 127
  • [27] The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect
    R. Dell’Acqua
    R. Job
    F. Peressotti
    A. Pascali
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2007, 14 : 717 - 722
  • [28] The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect
    Dell'Acqua, R.
    Job, R.
    Peressotti, F.
    Pascali, A.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (04) : 717 - 722
  • [29] Relative speed of processing affects interference in Stroop and picture-word interference paradigms: evidence from the distractor frequency effect
    Geng, Jingyi
    Schnur, Tatiana T.
    Janssen, Niels
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 29 (09) : 1100 - 1114
  • [30] Exploring the dynamics of aphasic word production using the picture-word interference task: A case study
    Wilshire, C
    Keall, LM
    Stuart, EJ
    O'Donnell, DJ
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 57 : 77 - 77