Co-producing an ecosystem services-based plan for sustainable university campuses

被引:4
|
作者
Gonzalez-Garcia, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Aguado, Mateo [1 ]
Solascasas, Paula [1 ]
Palomo, Ignacio [2 ]
Gonzalez, Jose A. [1 ,3 ]
Garcia-Llorente, Marina [1 ,3 ]
Hevia, Violeta [1 ,3 ]
Olmo, Rafael Mata [4 ,5 ]
Lopez-Santiago, Cesar A. [1 ,3 ]
Benayas, Javier [1 ]
Montes, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Ecol, Social Ecol Syst Lab, 2 Edificio Biol, Madrid 28049, Spain
[2] Univ Grenoble Alpes, IRD, CNRS, Grenoble INP,IGE, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[3] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Ctr Invest Biodivers & Cambio Global CIBC UAM, C Darwin 2, Madrid 28049, Spain
[4] Fdn Fernando Gonzalez Bernaldez, Oficina Tecn Europarc Espana, Madrid 28223, Spain
[5] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Geog, Madrid 28049, Spain
关键词
Territorial planning; Social-ecological systems; Mapping; Protected areas; Resilience; University management; CHALLENGES; SCIENCE; SCALE; MANAGEMENT; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104630
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In the context of global change, social-ecological perspectives for organisations and territorial planning schemes are key to facilitate a transition towards sustainability. Consequently, Ecosystem Services (ES) assessment and mapping are being increasingly used to enhance knowledge co-production for more sustainable territorial management. Higher education organizations have the potential to catalyse the sustainability transition of society, but there is a lack of studies integrating novel and current sustainable development approaches in spatial planning at university campuses. Here, we proposed an integrated approach for developing an ecosystem services-based plan to manage the campus of the Autonomous University of Madrid (Spain). We developed a participatory process integrating all the various actors and the decision making-bodies of the university. This participatory process involved meetings with different groups and 2,126 surveys administrated to students, professors, researchers and administration/services staff. We also developed a technical process for assessing ES including eight ES maps (four regulating, one provisioning and three cultural), consulted with the experts and stakeholders involved, and built the final version of the planning guide integrating all perspectives to promote ES-based strategic lines. Our results showed that ES maps are useful for creating management units and for multiscale analysis. ES maps highlighted important values of the campus, allowing the integration of more social actors that allow a stronger participative process and the creation of a long-term planning scheme. However, we identified certain aspects of the ES approach that hinder real-world application, including inherent problems associated with shifting politics.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ecosystem services-based multi-criteria assessment for ecologically sensitive watershed management
    Tezer, Azime
    Turkay, Zeynep
    Uzun, Osman
    Terzi, Fatih
    Koylu, Pinar
    Karacor, Elif
    Okay, Nilgun
    Kaya, Melek
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 22 (03) : 2431 - 2450
  • [42] Design thinking for practice-based intervention: Co-producing the change points toolkit to unlock (un)sustainable practices
    Hoolohan, Claire
    Browne, Alison L.
    DESIGN STUDIES, 2020, 67 (67) : 102 - 132
  • [43] Processes of co-producing a complex community based intervention in a disadvantaged neighborhood
    Termansen, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [44] Co-producing just and sustainable localities: emphasising the role of local authorities in current practices in Germany
    Weck, Sabine
    Ritzinger, Anne
    ERDE, 2021, 152 (04): : 232 - 243
  • [45] Mitigating Administrative Burdens: Understanding the Role of Intermediaries in Co-producing Digital Self-services
    Ryden, Hanne Hoglund
    Hofmann, Sara
    de Andrade, Luiz Henrique Alonso
    Heggertveit, Ida
    ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION, EPART 2024, 2024, 14891 : 31 - 46
  • [46] Co-producing to understand what matters to young people living in youth residential rehabilitation services
    Ennals, Priscilla
    Lessing, Kate
    Spies, Rebecca
    Egan, Rebecca
    Hemus, Philippa
    Droppert, Kathryn
    Tidhar, Michael
    Wood, Tom
    van Dijk, Carolien
    Bride, Rachael
    Asche, Alison
    Bendall, Sarah
    Simmons, Magenta
    EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 16 (07) : 782 - 791
  • [47] Analysis of forest-related policies for supporting ecosystem services-based forest management in Bangladesh
    Ahammad, Ronju
    Stacey, Natasha
    Sunderland, Terry
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 48
  • [48] Ecosystem services-based soil quality index tailored to the metropolitan environment for soil assessment and management
    Hyun, Junge
    Kim, You Jin
    Kim, Ara
    Plante, Alain F.
    Yoo, Gayoung
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 820
  • [49] Nature commodification: 'a necessary evil'? An analysis of the views of environmental professionals on ecosystem services-based approaches
    Martin-Ortega, Julia
    Azahara Mesa-Jurado, M.
    Pineda-Vazquez, Mariana
    Novo, Paula
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 37
  • [50] Identifying ecological production functions for use in ecosystem services-based environmental risk assessment of chemicals
    Faber, J. H.
    Marshall, S.
    Brown, A. R.
    Holt, A.
    van den Brink, P. J.
    Maltby, L.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 791 (791)