Non-destructive collection and metabarcoding of arthropod environmental DNA remained on a terrestrial plant

被引:6
作者
Yoneya, Kinuyo [1 ,2 ]
Ushio, Masayuki [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Miki, Takeshi [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Kindai Univ, Fac Agr, 3327-204, Nakamachi, Nara 6318505, Japan
[2] Ryukoku Univ, Ctr Biodivers Sci, 1-5 Yokotani, Seta Oe cho,, Otsu, Shiga 5202194, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Hakubi Ctr, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
[4] Kyoto Univ, Ctr Ecol Res, Otsu 5202113, Japan
[5] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ocean Sci, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Ryukoku Univ, Fac Adv Sci & Technol, 1-5 Yokotani, Seta Oe cho, Otsu, Shiga 5202194, Japan
关键词
BIODIVERSITY; DEGRADATION; COMMUNITIES; INSECTS; PRIMERS; EDNA;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-32862-4
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Reliable survey of arthropods is a crucial for their conservation, community ecology, and pest control on terrestrial plants. However, efficient and comprehensive surveys are hindered by challenges in collecting arthropods and identifying especially small species. To address this issue, we developed a non-destructive environmental DNA (eDNA) collection method termed "plant flow collection" to apply eDNA metabarcoding to terrestrial arthropods. This involves spraying distilled or tap water, or using rainfall, which eventually flows over the surface of the plant, and is collected in a container that is set at the plant base. DNA is extracted from collected water and a DNA barcode region of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene is amplified and sequenced using a high-throughput Illumina Miseq platform. We identified more than 64 taxonomic groups of arthropods at the family level, of which 7 were visually observed or artificially introduced species, whereas the other 57 groups of arthropods, including 22 species, were not observed in the visual survey. These results show that the developed method is possible to detect the arthropod eDNA remained on plants although our sample size was small and the sequence size was unevenly distributed among the three water types tested.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Developing a non-destructive metabarcoding protocol for detection of pest insects in bulk trap catches
    Batovska, Jana
    Piper, Alexander M.
    Valenzuela, Isabel
    Cunningham, John Paul
    Blacket, Mark J.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [22] Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities
    Deiner, Kristy
    Bik, Holly M.
    Machler, Elvira
    Seymour, Mathew
    Lacoursiere-Roussel, Anais
    Altermatt, Florian
    Creer, Simon
    Bista, Iliana
    Lodge, David M.
    de Vere, Natasha
    Pfrender, Michael E.
    Bernatchez, Louis
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2017, 26 (21) : 5872 - 5895
  • [23] BeeDNA: Microfluidic environmental DNA metabarcoding as a tool for connecting plant and pollinator communities
    Harper, Lynsey R.
    Niemiller, Matthew L.
    Benito, Joseph B.
    Paddock, Lauren E.
    Knittle, E.
    Molano-Flores, Brenda
    Davis, Mark A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2023, 5 (01): : 191 - 211
  • [24] Non-specific amplification compromises environmental DNA metabarcoding with COI
    Collins, Rupert A.
    Bakker, Judith
    Wangensteen, Owen S.
    Soto, Ana Z.
    Corrigan, Laura
    Sims, David W.
    Genner, Martin J.
    Mariani, Stefano
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 10 (11): : 1985 - 2001
  • [25] Environmental DNA metabarcoding from flowers reveals arthropod pollinators, plant pests, parasites, and potential predator-prey interactions while revealing more arthropod diversity than camera traps
    Johnson, Mark D.
    Katz, Aron D.
    Davis, Mark A.
    Tetzlaff, Sasha
    Edlund, David
    Tomczyk, Sonia
    Molano-Flores, Brenda
    Wilder, Tim
    Sperry, Jinelle H.
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2023, 5 (03): : 551 - 569
  • [26] Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals temporal dynamics but functional stability of arthropod communities in cattle dung
    Thomassen, Emil Ellegaard
    Sigsgaard, Eva Egelyng
    Jensen, Mads Reinholdt
    Olsen, Kent
    Hansen, Morten D. D.
    Thomsen, Philip Francis
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2024, 93 (08) : 1003 - 1021
  • [27] Metabarcoding of soil environmental DNA replicates plant community variation but not specificity
    Barnes, Christopher James
    Nielsen, Ida Broman
    Aagaard, Anne
    Ejrnaes, Rasmus
    Hansen, Anders Johannes
    Froslev, Tobias Guldberg
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2022, 4 (04): : 732 - 746
  • [28] Environmental DNA metabarcoding as a useful tool for evaluating terrestrial mammal diversity in tropical forests
    Mena, Jose Luis
    Yagui, Hiromi
    Tejeda, Vania
    Bonifaz, Emilio
    Bellemain, Eva
    Valentini, Alice
    Tobler, Mathias W.
    Sanchez-Vendizu, Pamela
    Lyet, Arnaud
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2021, 31 (05)
  • [29] DNA metabarcoding allows non-invasive identification of arthropod prey provisioned to nestling Rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus)
    Mora, Alison J.
    Prosse, Sean W. J.
    Mora, Jonathan A.
    PEERJ, 2019, 7
  • [30] Implementing high-throughput insect barcoding in microbiome studies: impact of non-destructive DNA extraction on microbiome reconstruction
    Andriienko, Veronika
    Buczek, Mateusz
    Meier, Rudolf
    Srivathsan, Amrita
    Lukasik, Piotr
    Kolasa, Micha l R.
    PEERJ, 2024, 12